Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
> I suspect that this is a dead end though, because in more complex
> designs the creation of circuits becomes cumbersome. Also, for the
> system I want to model, the circuits are OOH very complex and OTOH
> I don't have access to all circuit diagrams. :( So I think I'll
Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
> class Source(object):
Little bug: The __init__ method of class Source should look like
this.
def __init__(self, ID, neighbour = None):
self.connections = []
self.ID = ID
if neighbour: self.connections.append(neighbour)
Regards,
Björn
--
BOFH excuse #
Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> I'm interested! I was tempted to have a go at it after your
> initial post, it sounded like a nice little project :)
Here you go, see below (quite long). It works from Python 2.5
and above and should be straightly executable from command line.
(It'll work with lower Pyt
Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> I'm interested! I was tempted to have a go at it after your
> initial post, it sounded like a nice little project :)
Please stand by a day. I'm momentarily facing problems with currents
that never end (going in a circle). And my code doesn't look that
beatiful and/or clea
On May 11, 10:02 pm, Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
[...]
> P.S.: If anyone happens to be interested in details, just ask, I'll
> post some code.
I'm interested! I was tempted to have a go at it after your initial
post, it sounded like a nice little project :)
--
Arnaud
--
http://mail.python.org/m
Dave Baum wrote:
> Sounds reasonable. Depending on the size of your network, I might
> not worry too much about precomputing and saving information.
Thanks. Yes, I'm actually testing it presently without any
optimizations and it runs very well.
> If your circuit has loops in it (where the ou
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bjoern Schliessmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Sounds more familiar than the analog approach. Maybe I misunderstood
> something ... but I can't transfer my problem to this way of
> thinking yet. My biggest problem is the fact that relays aren't
> really interes
> From: Bjoern Schliessmann
> Sounds more familiar than the analog approach. Maybe I misunderstood
> something ... but I can't transfer my problem to this way of
> thinking yet. My biggest problem is the fact that relays aren't
> really interested in voltage, but current.
>
> Also, I find it diffi
Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> When you turn a switch off, it would send a message to the paths
> that depend on it (maybe via the controller?) so that they would
> be
> deactivated. In turn the lightbulbs on these paths would be
> informed that they are no longer active.
>
> When you turn a switch o
Dave Baum wrote:
> Are you trying to do logic simulation (digital) or analog circuit
> simulation?
Mh, a mix of both :) I want to simulate (in principle simple)
magnetic relay circuits. The only "evil tricks" that are used are
- shortcuts (e. g. a relay coil is bypassed and thus the relay gets
Stef Mientki wrote:
> Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
>> - sources (here begin currents)
>> - ground (here end currents)
> that doesn't bring you anywhere ;-)
It does :)
> Current doesn't start or end at some location,
> current flows through a closed circuit.
The part I omit is the voltage source.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bjoern Schliessmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to simulate simple electric logic (asynchronous)
> circuits. By "simple" I mean that I only want to know if I
> have "current" or "no current" (it's quite digital) and the only
> elements
hi Bjoern,
Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to simulate simple electric logic (asynchronous)
> circuits. By "simple" I mean that I only want to know if I
> have "current" or "no current" (it's quite digital) and the only
> elements need to be (with some level of abstraction
"Bjoern Schliessmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all,
| I'm trying to simulate simple electric logic (asynchronous)circuits.
[snip]
Some network simulators use connection objects in addition to node objects,
with connections joined to nodes but not the sa
Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> On May 7, 7:05 pm, Bjoern Schliessmann > There is a master "current controller" object which tells
>> the "source" object to start a "current" by calling its
>> neighbour. The calls traverse the network until they reach a
>> "ground" object. Specifically, the source passes
On May 7, 7:05 pm, Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to simulate simple electric logic (asynchronous)
> circuits. By "simple" I mean that I only want to know if I
> have "current" or "no current" (it's quite digital) and the only
> elements need to be (with some level of abstr
Hello all,
I'm trying to simulate simple electric logic (asynchronous)
circuits. By "simple" I mean that I only want to know if I
have "current" or "no current" (it's quite digital) and the only
elements need to be (with some level of abstraction to my specific
problem)
- sources (here begin curr
17 matches
Mail list logo
