Re: Spam reported

2009-10-21 Thread Peter Pearson
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:06:50 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Grant Edwards writes: >> On 2009-10-20, Peter Pearson wrote: >> >> > Reported to Google's groups-abuse. >> >> What are these postings supposed to mean? > > That the posting which started the thread (which you may or may not have > seen, so i

Re: Spam reported

2009-10-20 Thread Ben Finney
Grant Edwards writes: > On 2009-10-20, Peter Pearson wrote: > > > Reported to Google's groups-abuse. > > What are these postings supposed to mean? That the posting which started the thread (which you may or may not have seen, so it's good that Peter isn't quoting the original spam) has been rep

Re: Spam reported

2009-10-20 Thread Ned Deily
In article , Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2009-10-20, Peter Pearson wrote: > > Reported to Google's groups-abuse. > What are these postings supposed to mean? I think some people don't recognize that this forum is distributed through several channels (e.g. Usenet, python.org mailing list, gmane.o

Re: Spam reported

2009-10-20 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2009-10-20, Peter Pearson wrote: > Reported to Google's groups-abuse. What are these postings supposed to mean? -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! I've read SEVEN at MILLION books!! visi.c

Spam reported

2009-10-20 Thread Peter Pearson
Reported. -- To email me, substitute nowhere->spamcop, invalid->net. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Spam reported

2009-10-20 Thread Peter Pearson
Reported. -- To email me, substitute nowhere->spamcop, invalid->net. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Spam reported

2009-10-20 Thread Peter Pearson
Spam reported to Google. -- To email me, substitute nowhere->spamcop, invalid->net. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list