On 02/11/05, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I didn't regard the reply as unhelpful, and I believe the
> replier was honestly trying to get you to see that your rather naive
> suggestion was most unlikely to make things better.
>
To the OP
A tip for curing your own problem -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thank you for the flippant remarks. Let's just say that I found them to
> be unproductive.
>
> I would like to point out the process was not designed to be automatic
> and I don't believe made such a statement. I should clarify that my
> desire was to list each domain th
Thank you for the flippant remarks. Let's just say that I found them to
be unproductive.
I would like to point out the process was not designed to be automatic
and I don't believe made such a statement. I should clarify that my
desire was to list each domain that was contained in a spam email, so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In the last few months many personal website owners (such as myself)
> have found that spammers have been using their domain names to
> masquerade as valid users to send spam, normally in the form of:
> So, as a web programmer and someone who specialises in getting good
benmorganpowell:
> So, as a web programmer and someone who specialises in getting good
> results on Google, I realised that I could simply post every spammer
> website on a Google optimized page, which if searched for on Google
> would return something like:
>
> "WARNING: DO NOT BUY FROM THIS WEB
In the last few months many personal website owners (such as myself)
have found that spammers have been using their domain names to
masquerade as valid users to send spam, normally in the form of:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This new tactic has an annoying problem, which is that the bounced
emails end up b
