Hi John,
John Nagle nagle at animats.com writes:
All attempts to make the dialect defined by CPython significantly
faster have failed. PyPy did not achieve much of a speed
improvement over CPython, and is sometimes slower.
This is not true. While PyPy is indeed sometimes slower than
John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
All the schemes to speed up Python as defined by CPython seem to hit
a wall on speed improvement. Some of the numeric benchmarks go faster
on implementations that don't box all numbers, but 2x seems to be about
as good as it gets, even with a JIT
John Nagle, 11.10.2010 22:01:
It may be time to standardize RPython.
There are at least three implementations of RPython variants - PyPy,
Shed Skin, and RPython for LLVM. The first two are up and running.
The thing is, while RPython can be seen as a general purpose programming
language, it
Hi,
On 10/12/2010 07:41 AM, John Nagle wrote:
[...]
With Unladen Swallow looking like a failed IT project, a year
behind schedule and not delivering anything like the promised
performance, Google management may pull the plug on funding.
Since there hasn't been a quarterly release in a year,
On 10/12/2010 05:18 PM, Nils Ruettershoff wrote:
Hi,
On 10/12/2010 07:41 AM, John Nagle wrote:
[...]
With Unladen Swallow looking like a failed IT project, a year
behind schedule and not delivering anything like the promised
performance, Google management may pull the plug on funding.
Stefan Behnel, 12.10.2010 09:18:
If you implemented an RPython to CPython extension compiler, [...]
BTW, if anyone wanted to do that, it might be a good idea to start with
Cython, adapt its type inference layer and add the few missing Python
language features (or pay the core developers to
It may be time to standardize RPython.
There are at least three implementations of RPython variants - PyPy,
Shed Skin, and RPython for LLVM. The first two are up and running.
There's a theory paper on the subject:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:01 PM, John Nagle na...@animats.com wrote:
file:///C:/Users/nagle/AppData/Local/Temp/shedskin-tutorial-0.3.html
This gives me a 404. Your Web server is broken! Fix it! ;)
Temporarily mirrored: http://jedsmith.org/tmp/shedskin-tutorial-0.5.html
--
Jed Smith
On 10/11/2010 1:01 PM, John Nagle wrote:
(Correct Shed Skin tutorial link)
Shed Skin:
http://shedskin.googlecode.com/files/shedskin-tutorial-0.3.html
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 13:01 -0700, John Nagle wrote:
It may be time to standardize RPython.
There are at least three implementations of RPython variants - PyPy,
Shed Skin, and RPython for LLVM. The first two are up and running.
There's a theory paper on the subject:
On 10/11/2010 1:47 PM, Ryan Kelly wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 13:01 -0700, John Nagle wrote:
It may be time to standardize RPython.
There are at least three implementations of RPython variants - PyPy,
Shed Skin, and RPython for LLVM. The first two are up and running.
There's a theory
11 matches
Mail list logo
