On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:18:47 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
And I can't think of any reason why you should use os.waitpid() or
similar; use the .wait() method.
I have used WNOHANG to poll for completion of a subprocess while
providing progress updates to the user.
This can be done via
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:25:53 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
And I can't think of any reason why you should use os.waitpid() or
similar; use the .wait() method.
I have used WNOHANG to poll for completion of a subprocess while providing
progress updates to the user.
This can be done via
In message pan.2010.09.23.17.17.56.906...@nowhere.com, Nobody wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:25:53 +1200, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
And I can't think of any reason why you should use os.waitpid() or
similar; use the .wait() method.
I have used WNOHANG to poll for completion of a
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 23:54:04 -0700, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
As your Traceback clearly indicates, the Popen() call has already
completed; it's *the os.waitpid() call* that's blocking, but that's
entirely to be expected given its defined behavior. If you don't want
to wait around for the
In message pan.2010.09.22.16.38.25.844...@nowhere.com, Nobody wrote:
And I can't think of any reason why you should use os.waitpid() or
similar; use the .wait() method.
I have used WNOHANG to poll for completion of a subprocess while providing
progress updates to the user.
--
Hello,
The Popen call does not return if the underlying OS call runs longish,
as the example below shows.
Although, if the underlying OS call is merely sleep N it will return
even after quite a long time.
wikiu...@dvprwiki1:~ python --version
Python 2.6.4
wikiu...@dvprwiki1:~ time
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Jason Friedman jsf80...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
The Popen call does not return if the underlying OS call runs longish,
as the example below shows.
snip
wikiu...@dvprwiki1:~ time $HOME/scripts/subprocess_test.py
/opt/confluence-cli-1.5.0/confluence.sh --action