On Thu, 28 May 2015 06:03 am, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> You make the statement regarding Python3 "even while it is 10 to 20
> percent slower". Where is your evidence to support this statement?
Its well known that Python 3 is generally slower than Python 2. Cecil's
claim shouldn't be controversial,
On 27/05/2015 16:18, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Wednesday 27 May 2015 16:51 CEST schreef Mark Lawrence:
On 27/05/2015 15:11, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Wednesday 27 May 2015 15:44 CEST schreef Mark Lawrence:
On 27/05/2015 09:42, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Wednesday 27 May 2015 09:30 CEST schre
Op Wednesday 27 May 2015 16:51 CEST schreef Mark Lawrence:
> On 27/05/2015 15:11, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Op Wednesday 27 May 2015 15:44 CEST schreef Mark Lawrence:
>>
>>> On 27/05/2015 09:42, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Wednesday 27 May 2015 09:30 CEST schreef alb:
> But here I have
On 27/05/2015 15:11, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Wednesday 27 May 2015 15:44 CEST schreef Mark Lawrence:
On 27/05/2015 09:42, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Wednesday 27 May 2015 09:30 CEST schreef alb:
But here I have another question, as a python novice is there
really any reason for me to use an
Op Wednesday 27 May 2015 15:44 CEST schreef Mark Lawrence:
> On 27/05/2015 09:42, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Op Wednesday 27 May 2015 09:30 CEST schreef alb:
>>
>>> But here I have another question, as a python novice is there
>>> really any reason for me to use any particular version of Python?
>>
On 27/05/2015 09:42, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op Wednesday 27 May 2015 09:30 CEST schreef alb:
But here I have another question, as a python novice is there really
any reason for me to use any particular version of Python?
Should I start directly with the newest? What about 2.7?
In principal y
Op Wednesday 27 May 2015 09:30 CEST schreef alb:
> But here I have another question, as a python novice is there really
> any reason for me to use any particular version of Python?
>
> Should I start directly with the newest? What about 2.7?
In principal you should use the ‘latest’ 3. The only pr
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:30 PM, alb wrote:
> But here I have another question, as a python novice is there really any
> reason for me to use any particular version of Python?
>
> Should I start directly with the newest? What about 2.7?
>
Start with the newest that's conveniently available. With
2015-05-27 9:30 GMT+02:00 alb :
> Hi Mark,
> Mark Lawrence wrote:
> []
>>>File
>>> "/home/debian/repos/2418_IASI-NG/Documents/Tools/tex_tool/venv/local/lib/python3.2/site-packages/progress/bar.py",
>>> line 48
>>> empty_fill = u'∙'
>>>^
>>> SyntaxError: invalid s
Hi Mark,
Mark Lawrence wrote:
[]
>>File
>> "/home/debian/repos/2418_IASI-NG/Documents/Tools/tex_tool/venv/local/lib/python3.2/site-packages/progress/bar.py",
>> line 48
>> empty_fill = u'∙'
>>^
>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>>
[]
>
> Python 3.0 removed the 'u'
Hi Chris,
Chris Angelico wrote:
[]
>> Python 3.0 removed the 'u' for unicode in front of strings but due to
>> popular demand to ease porting it was reinstated in 3.3. Strip it away and
>> you should be fine to go.
>
> Or upgrade to 3.3 or better; is there anything holding you on 3.2?
> Buildin
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 26/05/2015 16:48, alb wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I've installed the 'progress' module (ver 1.2) and I have the following
>> error when used:
>>
>>File
>> "/home/debian/repos/2418_IASI-NG/Documents/Tools/tex_tool/venv/local/lib/pyt
On 26/05/2015 16:48, alb wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've installed the 'progress' module (ver 1.2) and I have the following
error when used:
File
"/home/debian/repos/2418_IASI-NG/Documents/Tools/tex_tool/venv/local/lib/python3.2/site-packages/progress/bar.py",
line 48
empty_fill = u'∙'
Hi everyone,
I've installed the 'progress' module (ver 1.2) and I have the following
error when used:
File
"/home/debian/repos/2418_IASI-NG/Documents/Tools/tex_tool/venv/local/lib/python3.2/site-packages/progress/bar.py",
line 48
empty_fill = u'∙'
^
SyntaxError: inv
14 matches
Mail list logo
