Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> x = y if C : else z
>>
>
>Currently scheduled for next (2.5) release, but not yet implemented.
This still makes me barf. Has Python jumped the shark?
It looks marginally better if you write it as:
x = (y if C else z)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailma
Ben Wilson wrote:
> I read somewhere else that Python was getting a ternary operator (e.g.
> x = (true/false) ? y : z). I read the PEP about it and that the PEP had
> been approved this past Fall. Has this been released into the wild yet?
>
> IIRC, the operator is like:
>
> x = y if C : else z
>
Ben Wilson wrote:
> I read somewhere else that Python was getting a ternary operator (e.g.
> x = (true/false) ? y : z). I read the PEP about it and that the PEP had
> been approved this past Fall. Has this been released into the wild yet?
>
> IIRC, the operator is like:
>
> x = y if C : else z
>
I read somewhere else that Python was getting a ternary operator (e.g.
x = (true/false) ? y : z). I read the PEP about it and that the PEP had
been approved this past Fall. Has this been released into the wild yet?
IIRC, the operator is like:
x = y if C : else z
--
http://mail.python.org/mailma
