; > 130048499.28737.44
> > 261120498.04499.03
> > 523264307.54312.04
> > 1047552173.57185.32
> > 2096128 93.61 94.39
>
> > x = ThreadingMixIn replies/s
> > y = ThreadPoolingMixIn replies/s
>
> We
1047552 173.57 185.32
> 2096128 93.61 94.39
>
> x = ThreadingMixIn replies/s
> y = ThreadPoolingMixIn replies/s
Well, I'd say you've got yourself a winner. Performance (at least on
FreeBSD) seems as good or better for your ThreadPoolingMixin than
ThreadingMixin.
g such a network service it would
> be valuable to see benchmark results for several data sizes. I'd expect
> better numbers for a ThreadPoolingMixIn when there are more requests
> with smaller data size.
>
> Ciao, Michael.
Here are benchmarks for FreeBSD 6.2, amd64
packet_siz
xpect
better numbers for a ThreadPoolingMixIn when there are more requests
with smaller data size.
Ciao, Michael.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jun 2, 7:09 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On May 31, 9:13 pm, Rhamphoryncus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On May 30, 2:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Hi, everybody!
>
> > > I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to cr
On May 31, 9:13 pm, Rhamphoryncus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 30, 2:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi, everybody!
>
> > I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create
> > fast thread-based servers. This mix-in works much faste
On May 31, 1:40 pm, "Giampaolo Rodola'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30 Mag, 22:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi, everybody!
>
> > I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create
> > fast thread-based servers.
On 30 Mag, 22:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, everybody!
>
> I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create
> fast thread-based servers. This mix-in works much faster than
> ThreadingMixIn because it doesn't create a new thread on each request.
>
On May 30, 2:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, everybody!
>
> I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create
> fast thread-based servers. This mix-in works much faster than
> ThreadingMixIn because it doesn't create a new thread on each reque
Hi, everybody!
I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create
fast thread-based servers. This mix-in works much faster than
ThreadingMixIn because it doesn't create a new thread on each request.
Is it worth including in SocketServer.py?
from __future__ i
10 matches
Mail list logo