Re: ThreadPoolingMixIn

2008-06-03 Thread pavel . uvarov
; > 130048499.28737.44 > > 261120498.04499.03 > > 523264307.54312.04 > > 1047552173.57185.32 > > 2096128 93.61 94.39 > > > x = ThreadingMixIn replies/s > > y = ThreadPoolingMixIn replies/s > > We

Re: ThreadPoolingMixIn

2008-06-02 Thread miller . paul . w
  1047552    173.57    185.32 >     2096128     93.61     94.39 > > x = ThreadingMixIn replies/s > y = ThreadPoolingMixIn replies/s Well, I'd say you've got yourself a winner. Performance (at least on FreeBSD) seems as good or better for your ThreadPoolingMixin than ThreadingMixin.

Re: ThreadPoolingMixIn

2008-06-02 Thread pavel . uvarov
g such a network service it would > be valuable to see benchmark results for several data sizes. I'd expect > better numbers for a ThreadPoolingMixIn when there are more requests > with smaller data size. > > Ciao, Michael. Here are benchmarks for FreeBSD 6.2, amd64 packet_siz

Re: ThreadPoolingMixIn

2008-06-02 Thread Michael Ströder
xpect better numbers for a ThreadPoolingMixIn when there are more requests with smaller data size. Ciao, Michael. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: ThreadPoolingMixIn

2008-06-02 Thread pavel . uvarov
On Jun 2, 7:09 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On May 31, 9:13 pm, Rhamphoryncus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On May 30, 2:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Hi, everybody! > > > > I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to cr

Re: ThreadPoolingMixIn

2008-06-02 Thread pavel . uvarov
On May 31, 9:13 pm, Rhamphoryncus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 30, 2:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi, everybody! > > > I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create > > fast thread-based servers. This mix-in works much faste

Re: ThreadPoolingMixIn

2008-05-31 Thread Rhamphoryncus
On May 31, 1:40 pm, "Giampaolo Rodola'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 30 Mag, 22:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Hi, everybody! > > > I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create > > fast thread-based servers.

Re: ThreadPoolingMixIn

2008-05-31 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
On 30 Mag, 22:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, everybody! > > I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create > fast thread-based servers. This mix-in works much faster than > ThreadingMixIn because it doesn't create a new thread on each request. >

Re: ThreadPoolingMixIn

2008-05-31 Thread Rhamphoryncus
On May 30, 2:40 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, everybody! > > I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create > fast thread-based servers. This mix-in works much faster than > ThreadingMixIn because it doesn't create a new thread on each reque

ThreadPoolingMixIn

2008-05-30 Thread pavel . uvarov
Hi, everybody! I wrote a useful class ThreadPoolingMixIn which can be used to create fast thread-based servers. This mix-in works much faster than ThreadingMixIn because it doesn't create a new thread on each request. Is it worth including in SocketServer.py? from __future__ i