[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I ended up taking this route for the most part. The worker thread
> first moves the file to be processed into a temp directory,
No, the watcher thread should do this itself *before*
putting it into the work queue. Then there's no chance
of it picking up the same file tw
On Aug 9, 9:45 pm, "Mark T" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > Hi all! I'm implementing one of my first multithreaded apps, and have
> > gotten to a point where I think I'm going off track from a standard
> > idiom. Wondering if
Using IPC is just adding needles complexity to your program. Instead
of constantly scanning the directory for files and then adding them to
a Queue, and then having to worry if that specific file may have
already been popped off the queue and is currently running by one of
the workers, just poll th
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi all! I'm implementing one of my first multithreaded apps, and have
> gotten to a point where I think I'm going off track from a standard
> idiom. Wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction.
>
> The script will run as
On Aug 9, 5:39 pm, MRAB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 9, 7:25 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi all! I'm implementing one of my first multithreaded apps, and have
> > gotten to a point where I think I'm going off track from a standard
> > idiom. Wondering if anyone can point me in the r
> approach. That sounds the easiest, although I'm still interested in
> any idioms or other proven approaches for this sort of thing.
>
> ~Sean
Idioms certainly have their place, but in the end you want clear,
correct code. In the case of multi-threaded programming,
synchronization adds complexi
On Aug 9, 12:09 pm, "Justin T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 9, 11:25 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Here's how I have it designed so far. The main thread starts a
> > Watch(threading.Thread) class that loops and searches a directory for
> > files. It has been passed a Queue.Queue() ob
On Aug 9, 7:25 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all! I'm implementing one of my first multithreaded apps, and have
> gotten to a point where I think I'm going off track from a standard
> idiom. Wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction.
>
> The script will run as a daemon and watch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all! I'm implementing one of my first multithreaded apps, and have
> gotten to a point where I think I'm going off track from a standard
> idiom. Wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction.
>
> The script will run as a daemon and watch a given directory
On Aug 9, 11:25 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Here's how I have it designed so far. The main thread starts a
> Watch(threading.Thread) class that loops and searches a directory for
> files. It has been passed a Queue.Queue() object (watch_queue), and
> as it finds new files in the watch folder
Hi all! I'm implementing one of my first multithreaded apps, and have
gotten to a point where I think I'm going off track from a standard
idiom. Wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction.
The script will run as a daemon and watch a given directory for new
files. Once it determines
11 matches
Mail list logo
