On 18Jun2012 00:17, John O'Hagan wrote:
| On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:27:45 -0400
| Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
| > Not "after each event is read" but when a new event is
| > generated/inserted. The list is not a FIFO where new events are added to
| > the end, but more of a priority queue where the l
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:27:45 -0400
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:01:12 +1000, John O'Hagan
> declaimed the following in
> gmane.comp.python.general:
>
> >
> > That looks like a possible way to do all the streams in a single thread,
> > although it works a little differently
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:34:57 -0400
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 03:24:13 +1000, John O'Hagan
> declaimed the following in
> gmane.comp.python.general:
>
>
> > I should have made it clear that I'm not using threads to speed anything up;
> > each thread produces an independentl
> > > My question is, on a single core machine, what are the pros and cons of
> > > threads vs subprocesses in a setup like this?
> > >
> [...]
> >
> > Two key phrases in your message; CPU-intensive,
> > single-core-machine. If these have the c
ng more work.
> >
> > My question is, on a single core machine, what are the pros and cons of
> > threads vs subprocesses in a setup like this?
> >
[...]
>
> Two key phrases in your message; CPU-intensive,
> single-core-machine. If these have the convent
se
> worker threads, I could just put their target code in separate executable
> files and launch them as subprocesses. That way there would be fewer threads,
> but each subprocess would be doing more work.
>
> My question is, on a single core machine, what are the pros and co
em as subprocesses. That way there would be fewer threads,
but each subprocess would be doing more work.
My question is, on a single core machine, what are the pros and cons of
threads vs subprocesses in a setup like this?
Thanks,
John
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
