CM wrote:
>
>On Apr 16, 3:31 am, Tim Roberts wrote:
>>
>> Microsoft's intent is that you be able to distribute the non-debug runtimes
>> with any applications built with Visual Studio. They are evil, but not
>> arbitrarily malicious.
>
>Just to be clear: are you saying that if one has Visual St
On 04/17/10 03:40, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
> Lie,
>
>> Does it makes sense to be able to install a library in other's computer, but
>> not redistribute it? Hmm... I'll have to consult a lawyer.
>
> See Tim Robert's response (I can't remember which Python mailing list)
>
I was responding to A
Lie,
> Does it makes sense to be able to install a library in other's computer, but
> not redistribute it? Hmm... I'll have to consult a lawyer.
See Tim Robert's response (I can't remember which Python mailing list)
The license agreement change fixes a problem that was accidentally
introduced
On 04/15/10 06:38, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
> Alex,
>
>> I do not see anything about redistribution, only installation, unless I am
>> missing something?
>
> I read "installation" to mean the same as "redistribution" in the
> context of this article. Perhaps I'm wrong?
>
Does it makes sense t
On Apr 16, 3:31 am, Tim Roberts wrote:
> Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>
> >I don't think this license agreement change involves the express
> >editions, which are free. Correct me if I'm wrong here?
>
> The license agreement change fixes a problem that was accidentally
> introduced by Visual Studio 200
rily malicious.
:)
Regards,
Malcolm
- Original message -
From: "Tim Roberts"
To: python-list@python.org
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:31:35 -0700
Subject: Re: Updated License Term Agreement for VC Redistributable in VS
2008 SP1
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>
>I don't think this li
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>
>I don't think this license agreement change involves the express
>editions, which are free. Correct me if I'm wrong here?
The license agreement change fixes a problem that was accidentally
introduced by Visual Studio 2008 SP1. The redistributable package that can
be dow
Andrej,
> I don't think this license agreement change involves the express editions,
> which are free. Correct me if I'm wrong here?
I don't know.
Malcolm
> 1. MS VC 2008 runtime files: msvcr90.dll, msvcp90.dll, msvcm90.dll
The article links to this Knowledge Base article:
http://support.micr
e:
> I just stumbled across the following page which seems to indicate that
> the MS VC 2008 runtime files[1] required to distribute Python
> applications compiled with Py2exe and similar tools can be shipped
> without the license restriction many previously thought.
>
> See: Updated
On Apr 14, 10:11 pm, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
> I just stumbled across the following page which seems to indicate that
> the MS VC 2008 runtime files[1] required to distribute Python
> applications compiled with Py2exe and similar tools can be shipped
> without the license restriction many previou
compiled with Py2exe and similar tools can be shipped
> without the license restriction many previously thought.
>
> See: Updated License Term Agreement for VC Redistributable in VS 2008
> SP1
> http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/KB956414
>
>
> The End User License Agreement (EULA
VC Redistributable in VS 2008
SP1
http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/KB956414
The End User License Agreement (EULA) attached to the English version of
Visual C++ (VC) Redistributable Package (VCRedistx86.exe,
VCRedistx64.exe, and VCRedist_ia64.exe) in Microsoft Visual Studio 2008
does not let you
12 matches
Mail list logo
