Matthew Wilson wrote:
> I'm interested to hear how other people deal with really similar
> code.
> The similarity just bugs me. However, I wonder if using stuff
> like closures or partial function application is needlessly showy.
ACK -- but not because it's showy, but because it may be more
erro
On Sep 27, 3:01 am, Matthew Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote some code to create a user and update a user on a remote box by
> sending emails to that remote box. When I was done, I realized that my
> create_user function and my update_user function were effectively
> identical except fo
Matthew Wilson a écrit :
> I wrote some code to create a user and update a user on a remote box by
> sending emails to that remote box. When I was done, I realized that my
> create_user function and my update_user function were effectively
> identical except for different docstrings and a single d
En Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:01:17 -0300, Matthew Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribi�:
> I wrote some code to create a user and update a user on a remote box by
> sending emails to that remote box. When I was done, I realized that my
> create_user function and my update_user function were effectively
On Sep 27, 2:01 pm, Matthew Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote some code to create a user and update a user on a remote box by
> sending emails to that remote box. When I was done, I realized that my
> create_user function and my update_user function were effectively
> identical except fo
On Sep 26, 9:01 pm, Matthew Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote some code to create a user and update a user on a remote box by
> sending emails to that remote box. When I was done, I realized that my
> create_user function and my update_user function were effectively
> identical except fo
I wrote some code to create a user and update a user on a remote box by
sending emails to that remote box. When I was done, I realized that my
create_user function and my update_user function were effectively
identical except for different docstrings and a single different value
inside:
### V