Tim Roberts wrote:
> "OKB (not okblacke)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> For years now Python has not supported variable-length
>> lookbehinds.
>>I'm just curious whether there are any plans to change this in
>>Python 3.0, or before, or after. It seems that Perl 6 will allow
>
"OKB (not okblacke)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For years now Python has not supported variable-length lookbehinds.
>I'm just curious whether there are any plans to change this in Python
>3.0, or before, or after. It seems that Perl 6 will allow variable-
>width lookbehinds (see http:
Gary Herron wrote:
> OKB (not okblacke) wrote:
>> Paul Rubin wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "OKB (not okblacke)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
For years now Python has not supported variable-length
lookbehinds.
>>> I'm not sure what that is and the perl links
OKB (not okblacke) wrote:
> Paul Rubin wrote:
>
>
>> "OKB (not okblacke)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> For years now Python has not supported variable-length
>>> lookbehinds.
>>>
>> I'm not sure what that is and the perl links you gave don't work,
>> but it
Paul Rubin wrote:
> "OKB (not okblacke)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> For years now Python has not supported variable-length
>> lookbehinds.
>
> I'm not sure what that is and the perl links you gave don't work,
> but it sounds evil.
The links work fine for me. . .
"OKB (not okblacke)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For years now Python has not supported variable-length lookbehinds.
I'm not sure what that is and the perl links you gave don't work, but
it sounds evil. Basically it sounds like an even uglier form of
regexp backtracking than what we hav
For years now Python has not supported variable-length lookbehinds.
I'm just curious whether there are any plans to change this in Python
3.0, or before, or after. It seems that Perl 6 will allow variable-
width lookbehinds (see http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/apo/A05.html
and htt
