Carl Cerecke wrote:
> Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>
>> Carl Cerecke wrote:
>>
>>
>>> It turns out that generators are more efficient than the eval function
>>> excuting bits of compiled code. About 20-25% faster.
>>
>>
>>
>> why are you using generators to return things from a function, when
>> you can j
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Carl Cerecke wrote:
>
>
>>It turns out that generators are more efficient than the eval function
>>excuting bits of compiled code. About 20-25% faster.
>
>
> why are you using generators to return things from a function, when
> you can just return the things ?
Trying to
