On Aug 26, 8:19 am, 一首诗 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's your first choice when you have write a C/C++ module for Python?
1. Plain C code
2. Implement my own C extension code generator in Python
3. ctypes
...
...
Infinity. SWIG
Carl Banks
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
一首诗 wrote:
Hi all,
I read this interesting post comparing Boost.Python with Pyd:
http://pyd.dsource.org/vsboost.html
What's your opinion about it?
What's your first choice when you have write a C/C++ module for Python?
I'm using handwritten C code or Cython/Pyrex to create Python C
extensi
ctypes and swig for me
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> 一首诗 wrote:
> > I read this interesting post comparing Boost.Python with Pyd:
> >
> > http://pyd.dsource.org/vsboost.html
> >
> > What's your opinion about it?
> >
> > What's your first choice when
一首诗 wrote:
> I read this interesting post comparing Boost.Python with Pyd:
>
> http://pyd.dsource.org/vsboost.html
>
> What's your opinion about it?
>
> What's your first choice when you have write a C/C++ module for Python?
There is no such thing as a C/C++ language. Seriously, both are really
On 26 Aug., 14:19, 一首诗 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I read this interesting post comparing Boost.Python with Pyd:
>
> http://pyd.dsource.org/vsboost.html
>
> What's your opinion about it?
>
> What's your first choice when you have write a C/C++ module for Python?
I prefer ctypes or f2p
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I read this interesting post comparing Boost.Python with Pyd:
> http://pyd.dsource.org/vsboost.html
> What's your opinion about it?
> What's your first choice when you have write a C/C++ module for Python?
That's not exactly a post.
Pyd works well enough, it's easy to use and
Hi all,
I read this interesting post comparing Boost.Python with Pyd:
http://pyd.dsource.org/vsboost.html
What's your opinion about it?
What's your first choice when you have write a C/C++ module for Python?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
