On Dec 1, 9:18 pm, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Release a final 2.x version with whatever internal changes but with
> external api unchanged or at least backward compatible. Mark items to
> be deleted as deprecated. Keep that available indefinately.
>
> Then release a 3.0 version wi
Michele Simionato wrote:
What do you people think?
I am not a user yet, but my opinion anyway...
Release a final 2.x version with whatever internal changes but with
external api unchanged or at least backward compatible. Mark items to
be deleted as deprecated. Keep that available indefin
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Michele Simionato
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am thinking about releasing a new version of the decorator module,
> [...]
Just FYI, the module being discussed here is
http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~micheles/python/documentation.html
I dont use it myself, but given h
I am thinking about releasing a new version of the decorator module,
completely rewritten from scratch. The new implementation takes half
the lines of the original one and it is much more general, so I like
it more. However, there is an issue of compatibility with the past and
I am asking here for
