On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:47:58 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> The replacement would need to work with Py 3. TK does. I have not
> noticed that anything else does, though that should change eventually.
> (And I am sure someone will point of something I have not noticed.)
PyQt does.
Phil
--
http://ma
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I sorta' wish he'd just come out and say, "This is what I think would
be suitable for a GUI toolkit for Python: ...".
He is not in the business of designing GUI toolkits, but in the business
of designing programming languages. So he abstains from specifying
(or even
" He was
very frustrated with
how long it took anyone to create a graphical toolkit to create webpages.
So, what *does* Guido want in a GUI toolkit for Python?
His concern really isn't what is in the toolkit, but what isn't.
It must not require lots of lines of code to p
Casey Hawthorne wrote:
>>So, what *does* Guido want in a GUI toolkit for Python?
>
> I saw a talk by a school teacher on pyFLTK: GUI programming made easy.
>
> On another note: I#: Groovy makes it easy to tie into the Java Swing
> GUI, so if Python could do that, with t
specifying
(or even recommending) a GUI library.
What he makes clear is the point that Terry cites: no matter what the
GUI toolkit is or what features it has - it should be simple to create
GUIs, as simple as creating HTML.
So, what *does* Guido want in a GUI toolkit for Python?
His
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:17:22 -0700, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>> His concern really isn't what is in the toolkit, but what isn't.
>> It must not require lots of lines of code to produce a simple
>> GUI, it must not require specification of absolute coordinates,
>> ... - you should be able to contin
sorta' wish he'd just come out and say, "This is what I think would
> be suitable for a GUI toolkit for Python: ...". That way, someone
> could then just come along and implement it. (Or maybe he's said this
> and I missed it?)
>
> So, what *does* Guido want in
On 27 Jun., 23:06, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> > I sorta' wish he'd just come out and say, "This is what I think would
> > be suitable for a GUI toolkit for Python: ...".
>
> He is not in the business of designing GUI toolkits, but in the business
> of designing programming languages. So he abstain
r even recommending) a GUI library.
What he makes clear is the point that Terry cites: no matter what the
GUI toolkit is or what features it has - it should be simple to create
GUIs, as simple as creating HTML.
> So, what *does* Guido want in a GUI toolkit for Python?
His concern really isn'
On Jun 27, 1:47 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> laplacia...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > So, what *does* Guido want in a GUI toolkit for Python?
>
> What he did say is "But it hasn't really gotten any less complex to
> create the simplest of simple UIs. And that's a shame
his is what I think would
be suitable for a GUI toolkit for Python: ...". That way, someone
could then just come along and implement it. (Or maybe he's said this
and I missed it?)
So, what *does* Guido want in a GUI toolkit for Python?
What he did say is "But it hasn't
>So, what *does* Guido want in a GUI toolkit for Python?
I saw a talk by a school teacher on pyFLTK: GUI programming made easy.
On another note: I#: Groovy makes it easy to tie into the Java Swing
GUI, so if Python could do that, with the added complication being the
user would need a
uitable for a GUI toolkit for Python: ...". That way, someone
could then just come along and implement it. (Or maybe he's said this
and I missed it?)
So, what *does* Guido want in a GUI toolkit for Python?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
13 matches
Mail list logo
