On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Frank Millman wrote:
> I *think* I have created a project on GitHub and uploaded my software there.
> It is called "AccInABox".
https://github.com/FrankMillman/AccInABox
Seems to be all there!
You seem to have a default README.md as well as your README that has
"Chris Angelico" wrote in message
news:captjjmp_jfxth_l6us30gbotmbyhw_imu-pjdglevgj2nut...@mail.gmail.com...
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Frank Millman wrote:
>>
>> This is quite a timely message for me. I am inching closer to releasing a
>> version of my accounting software, and a lot of
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> I'd venture to say files are quite independent most of the time. That's
> why such merges have been facilitated to the point that negates the
> "feature" you mentioned. Nobody cares to take the trouble of analyzing
> the validity of automati
Chris Angelico :
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> parallel changes always result in a conflict that requires merging.
>
> This is a feature, not a problem. As far as most version control
> systems are concerned, files aren't independent. However, the merge
> should be t
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> The "simple hg commands" are generally not all that different (in my limited
> experience) than the "simple git commands," for some definition of "simple."
> Stuff like clone, init, push, pull, commit, the small number of commands you
> use
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Thanks for the tip. I've been looking for the magic bullet since I had
> to abandon Sun's TeamWare years back. Unfortunately, fossil seems to
> suffer from the same problem as git and hg: they all consider the whole
> repository to be the ve
Am 27.08.14 09:50, schrieb Frank Millman:
This is quite a timely message for me. I am inching closer to releasing a
version of my accounting software, and a lot of the above comments apply to
me as well. At present I am the only developer, and my project is not hosted
anywhere, so I have to decid
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> I use hg because 1) python-dev uses hg; and 2) I understand the simple hg
> commands. I find git confusing, and my main uses are commit, pull, update,
> an occasional merge, and a rare rollback -- not complicated stuff.
The "simple hg comm
On 08/27/2014 11:51 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
Thank God for StackOverflow. :-)
+1 QotW
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 08/27/2014 10:29 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
Git has won the battle
Good thing there's room for more than one technology.
I use hg because 1) python-dev uses hg; and 2) I understand the simple hg commands. I find git confusing, and my main
uses are commit, pull, update, an occasional merge, a
On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 10:44:37 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Paul Rubin :
> > "Frank Millman" writes:
> >> I could stick to hg (or git) but I have recently come across fossil,
> >> and it seems ideal for my needs. Has anyone used it?
> > I've played with it. It's incredibly impressi
On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 5:24:40 PM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On 8/27/14 3:50 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
> > "Ian Kelly" wrote in message
> >> Ugh. There seems to be no public repository, and the only source to be
> >> found is from release-versioned tarballs, so there's apparently no
>
Paul Rubin :
> "Frank Millman" writes:
>> I could stick to hg (or git) but I have recently come across fossil,
>> and it seems ideal for my needs. Has anyone used it?
>
> I've played with it. It's incredibly impressive for such a
> comparatively small program.
Thanks for the tip. I've been looki
"Frank Millman" writes:
> I could stick to hg (or git) but I have recently come across fossil,
> and it seems ideal for my needs. Has anyone used it?
I've played with it. It's incredibly impressive for such a
comparatively small program. But, it's kind of niche, and even hg has
become niche, e
On 8/27/14 3:50 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
"Ian Kelly" wrote in message
news:calwzidkro_hryamwxbk0go-w1oj6ty6myb_c5vhxb6okgol...@mail.gmail.com...
Ugh. There seems to be no public repository, and the only source to be
found is from release-versioned tarballs, so there's apparently no
collaborat
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Frank Millman wrote:
>
> This is quite a timely message for me. I am inching closer to releasing a
> version of my accounting software, and a lot of the above comments apply to
> me as well. At present I am the only developer, and my project is not hosted
> anywher
"Ian Kelly" wrote in message
news:calwzidkro_hryamwxbk0go-w1oj6ty6myb_c5vhxb6okgol...@mail.gmail.com...
>
> Ugh. There seems to be no public repository, and the only source to be
> found is from release-versioned tarballs, so there's apparently no
> collaboration other than some forums for repor
17 matches
Mail list logo
