alex23 wrote:
Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
alex23 wrote:
To me, the explicit reference to the base class violates DRY. It also
means you need to manually change all such references should the base
class ever change, something that using super() avoids.
I found the correct answe
alex23 wrote:
Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
a possible answer:
- explicit >> implicit
I'm not sure this is the correct one though :)
To me, the explicit reference to the base class violates DRY. It also
means you need to manually change all such references should the base
class ever c
