[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a difference between theory and practice.
You know the difference between theory and practice? Well, in theory,
there is no difference :-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick Useldinger wrote:
Depends on what language you know best. But Java is certainly easier
to
read than C++.
There's certainly some irony in those last two sentences. However, I
agree with the former. It depends on which you know better, the style
of those who
Hey all:
Thanks for the responses...
I've found a third open source implementation in pascal (delphi), and
was wondering how well that would translate to python?
-cjl
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 29 Mar 2005 11:02:38 -0800, cjl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all:
Thanks for the responses...
I've found a third open source implementation in pascal (delphi), and
was wondering how well that would translate to python?
cjl, I think that the responses on the list so far collectively
cjl wrote:
I've found a third open source implementation in pascal (delphi), and
was wondering how well that would translate to python?
Being old enough to have programmed in UCSD Pascal on an Apple ][ (with
a language card, of course), I'd say: go for Pascal!
;-)
--
If you have three different implementations, and can read all three of
them well enough to understand the code, use all three.
If you are going to port software from one language to another, and
want to reimplement it properly in your target language, you won't be
porting word-for-word anyway.
Hey all:
I'm working on a 'pure' python port of some existing software.
Implementations of what I'm trying to accomplish are available (open
source) in C++ and in Java.
Which would be easier for me to use as a reference?
I'm not looking for automated tools, just trying to gather opinions on
cjl wrote:
Implementations of what I'm trying to accomplish are available (open
source) in C++ and in Java.
Which would be easier for me to use as a reference?
I'm not looking for automated tools, just trying to gather opinions on
which language is easier to understand / rewrite as python.
Depends
Patrick Useldinger wrote:
cjl wrote:
Implementations of what I'm trying to accomplish are available
(open
source) in C++ and in Java.
Which would be easier for me to use as a reference?
I'm not looking for automated tools, just trying to gather opinions
on
which language is easier
cjl wrote:
Hey all:
I'm working on a 'pure' python port of some existing software.
Implementations of what I'm trying to accomplish are available (open
source) in C++ and in Java.
Which would be easier for me to use as a reference?
I haven't touched C++ in a long time, my experience porting Java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick Useldinger wrote:
cjl wrote:
Implementations of what I'm trying to accomplish are available
(open
source) in C++ and in Java.
Which would be easier for me to use as a reference?
I'm not looking for automated tools, just trying to gather opinions
on
which language
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
cjl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all:
I'm working on a 'pure' python port of some existing software.
Implementations of what I'm trying to accomplish are available (open
source) in C++ and in Java.
Which would be easier for me to use as a reference?
Patrick Useldinger wrote:
cjl wrote:
Depends on what language you know best. But Java is certainly easier
to read than C++.
There is a difference between theory and practice. In theory, Java is
easier to read than C++.
In practice however, the average Java programmer is MUCH less talented
13 matches
Mail list logo
