Random832 schrieb am 24.06.2016 um 15:09:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016, at 02:39, dieter wrote:
>> You want an incremental parser if the XML documents are so huge that
>> you must process them incrementally rather than have a data structure
>> representing the whole document (in memory). Incremental pars
On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 8:44:49 PM UTC-4, Sayth Renshaw wrote:
> On Friday, 24 June 2016 07:03:18 UTC+10, David Shi wrote:
> > Which one is the best XML-parser?
> > Can any one tell me?
> > Regards.
> > David
>
> Most use lxml http://lxml.de/index.html
&g
On Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 11:03:18 PM UTC+2, David Shi wrote:
> Which one is the best XML-parser?
> Can any one tell me?
> Regards.
> David
Lxml offers lxml.etree.iterparse
(http://lxml.de/tutorial.html#event-driven-parsing), an important combination
of the memory savings of
On Friday, 24 June 2016 07:03:18 UTC+10, David Shi wrote:
> Which one is the best XML-parser?
> Can any one tell me?
> Regards.
> David
Most use lxml http://lxml.de/index.html
Sayth
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Friday, 24 June 2016 07:03:18 UTC+10, David Shi wrote:
> Which one is the best XML-parser?
> Can any one tell me?
> Regards.
> David
xml parser most use lxml http://lxml.de/index.html
Sayth
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Friday, 24 June 2016 07:03:18 UTC+10, David Shi wrote:
> Which one is the best XML-parser?
> Can any one tell me?
> Regards.
> David
Most would use lxml
sayth
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Friday, 24 June 2016 07:03:18 UTC+10, David Shi wrote:
> Which one is the best XML-parser?
> Can any one tell me?
> Regards.
> David
Most use lxml
Sayth
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Lxml
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Random832 :
>> You know what would be really nice? A "semi-incremental" parser that
>> can e.g. yield (whether through an event or through the iterator
>> protocol) a fully formed element (preferably one that can be queried
>> with xpath) at a time for each record of a docu
Random832 :
> You know what would be really nice? A "semi-incremental" parser that
> can e.g. yield (whether through an event or through the iterator
> protocol) a fully formed element (preferably one that can be queried
> with xpath) at a time for each record of a document representing a
> list of
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016, at 02:39, dieter wrote:
> You want an incremental parser if the XML documents are so huge that
> you must process them incrementally rather than have a data structure
> representing the whole document (in memory). Incremental parsers
> for XML are usually called "SAX" parsers.
David Shi via Python-list writes:
> Which one is the best XML-parser?
"best" is not an absolute term but depends on criteria/conditions.
There are essentially two kinds of parsers: incremental parsers
which parse the structure and report events for everything they see
and no
Which one is the best XML-parser?
Can any one tell me?
Regards.
David
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
13 matches
Mail list logo