On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:04:25 -0500 Peng Yu wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Andreas Waldenburger
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:52:44 -0500 Peng Yu
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle
> >> wrote:
> >> What are the differences between 2.5 and 2.6?
> >
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Andreas Waldenburger
wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:52:44 -0500 Peng Yu wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle
>> wrote:
>> What are the differences between 2.5 and 2.6?
>
> http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.6.html
Are all packages availab
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:52:44 -0500 Peng Yu wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle
> wrote:
> What are the differences between 2.5 and 2.6?
http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.6.html
/W
--
INVALID? DE!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle wrote:
> Kee Nethery wrote:
>>
>> I am in 2.x because the IDE I am using does not support stepping through
>> my code when in 3.x. As soon as the IDE I use supports debugging in 3.x, I'm
>> moving up to 3.x.
>>
>> I would prefer to be in 3.x because all
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:25:47 -0700, Kee Nethery wrote:
> I would prefer to be in 3.x because all the inconsistencies of how you
> do things in 2.x make it harder than it needs to be to learn the
> language.
>
> People who have been coding in 2.x for along time don't notice how the
> syntax is won
I have just started using 2.6 (upgrade from 2.5). All my web
applications' code (using Django), work without any changes.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Kee Nethery wrote:
I am in 2.x because the IDE I am using does not support stepping through
my code when in 3.x. As soon as the IDE I use supports debugging in 3.x,
I'm moving up to 3.x.
I would prefer to be in 3.x because all the inconsistencies of how you
do things in 2.x make it harder tha
I am in 2.x because the IDE I am using does not support stepping
through my code when in 3.x. As soon as the IDE I use supports
debugging in 3.x, I'm moving up to 3.x.
I would prefer to be in 3.x because all the inconsistencies of how you
do things in 2.x make it harder than it needs to be
Peng Yu wrote:
On Sep 12, 4:10 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
Peng Yu wrote:
Hi,
I just start python programming. That is, I don't have any legacy
code. I notice that there are different versions of python. I would
guess that older version of python has the more libraries than newer
versions. But the
On Sep 12, 4:10 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Peng Yu wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I just start python programming. That is, I don't have any legacy
> > code. I notice that there are different versions of python. I would
> > guess that older version of python has the more libraries than newer
> > versions. But
On Sep 12, 3:47 pm, Peng Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just start python programming. That is, I don't have any legacy
> code. I notice that there are different versions of python. I would
> guess that older version of python has the more libraries than newer
> versions. But the code developed in newer ve
Peng Yu wrote:
Hi,
I just start python programming. That is, I don't have any legacy
code. I notice that there are different versions of python. I would
guess that older version of python has the more libraries than newer
versions. But the code developed in newer versions might be better
support
Hi,
I just start python programming. That is, I don't have any legacy
code. I notice that there are different versions of python. I would
guess that older version of python has the more libraries than newer
versions. But the code developed in newer versions might be better
supported in the future.
13 matches
Mail list logo
