Why Python forbids multiple instances of one module?
If only Python allows multiple instances of one module, module will
be enough to replace class in most cases.
After all, it is much easier to write a module than a class, at least we do
not have to write self everywhere.
If you really
module obj is instance of types.ModuleType, which is instance of
'type', where class obj is instance of 'type'. even only at this
point, they're diff in to many ways. there are so many things to do
when you truly want module to replace class, as pointed by 2 posts
above
i'm also a beginner, so i
Why Python forbids multiple instances of one module?
If only Python allows multiple instances of one module, module will be enough
to replace class in most cases.
After all, it is much easier to write a module than a class, at least we do not
have to write self everywhere.
--
http
2010/7/4 CHEN Guang dr...@126.com:
Why Python forbids multiple instances of one module?
If only Python allows multiple instances of one module, module will
be enough to replace class in most cases.
After all, it is much easier to write a module than a class, at least we do
not have to write
2010/7/4 CHEN Guang dr...@126.com:
Why Python forbids multiple instances of one module?
That's just how its import mechanism works. It allows for modules that
need canonical program-wide state to rely on being singleton, and it's
also an optimization.
You can trick the import machinery and get
