On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:41:23 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.03.16.1421 +0100]:
Why doesn't it just yield
'params\nparam\nvalue//param\n/params\n'
Or even just
'params\nparam/\n/params\n'
There's a difference between those two.
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 14:21:40 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Hi,
xmlrpclib.dumps((None,), allow_none=True) yields
'params\nparam\nvaluenil//value/param\n/params\n'
Why doesn't it just yield
'params\nparam\nvalue//param\n/params\n'
Or even just
'params\nparam/\n/params\n'
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.03.16.1421 +0100]:
Why doesn't it just yield
'params\nparam\nvalue//param\n/params\n'
Or even just
'params\nparam/\n/params\n'
There's a difference between those two. The first one has an empty
string value ('') while the second
Hi,
xmlrpclib.dumps((None,), allow_none=True) yields
'params\nparam\nvaluenil//value/param\n/params\n'
Why doesn't it just yield
'params\nparam\nvalue//param\n/params\n'
Or even just
'params\nparam/\n/params\n'
Those are valid XML and valid XML-RPC, but nil/ isn't.
Thanks for any
2008/3/16, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
xmlrpclib.dumps((None,), allow_none=True) yields
'params\nparam\nvaluenil//value/param\n/params\n'
Why doesn't it just yield
'params\nparam\nvalue//param\n/params\n'
Or even just
'params\nparam/\n/params\n'
Those are valid XML