multiprocessing is good enough for now,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phillip B Oldham schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Chris Rebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it will definitely not.
From your statement (and I'm terribly sorry if
Will Python 3 be stackless? Or, rather, will it have any features
similar to stackless' microthreads and channels?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Phillip B Oldham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will Python 3 be stackless? Or, rather, will it have any features
similar to stackless' microthreads and channels?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
No, it will definitely not. But it does have
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Chris Rebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it will definitely not.
From your statement (and I'm terribly sorry if I've taken it out of
context) it would seem that such features are frowned-upon. Is this
correct? And if so, why?
--
Phillip B Oldham
[EMAIL
Phillip B Oldham schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Chris Rebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it will definitely not.
From your statement (and I'm terribly sorry if I've taken it out of
context) it would seem that such features are frowned-upon. Is this
correct? And if so, why?
You
Phillip B Oldham wrote:
Will Python 3 be ...
The features of Python 3.0 are fixed; there are just a few remaining
bugs to fix before the final release. Download the release candidate or
look at the online manual at
http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/
--
