Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:48:39 -0600:
> There is a VERY large website that uses Zope/ZODB that takes up to
> 9000 hits per second when it gets busy. ZODB is very fast and
> holds up well under load.
But, you will not get 9000 hits per second from the ZODB (unl
Larry Bates wrote:
> There is a VERY large website that uses Zope/ZODB that takes up to
> 9000 hits per second when it gets busy. ZODB is very fast and
> holds up well under load.
If it's true, I'm glad. Other side of think is, on what hardware is this
site running :o)
> You should probably l
Quote Larry Bates:
> There is a VERY large website that uses Zope/ZODB that takes up to
> 9000 hits per second when it gets busy.
What's the url? I just got curious to see it a big site on Zope in
action.
-
Lars
"Pythonfan stuck with c sharp"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyt
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:31:27 +0100, Almad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm going to write a custom CMS. I'd like to use some odbms, as code is then
>much more cleaner...
You should go ask for pratical infos on ZODB here:
http://www.zope.org/Products/StandaloneZODB
Joe.
--
http://mail.python.org/
There is a VERY large website that uses Zope/ZODB that takes up to
9000 hits per second when it gets busy. ZODB is very fast and
holds up well under load.
You should probably look at Plone. It is CMS already built on
top of Zope. Might safe you a LOT of work.
Larry Bates
Almad wrote:
> Hello
I don't think you have anything to worry about. Consider that this is
exactly what ZODB was designed for. It is, after all, the database back-end
for Zope itself, which is just another (very good, some say) CMS.
Almad wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm going to write a custom CMS. I'd like to use some odbm
Hello,
I'm going to write a custom CMS. I'd like to use some odbms, as code is then
much more cleaner...however, i'm a little bit scared about capabilities of
ZoDB, when compared with f. e. Firebird.
How much instances is Zodb able to handle? Under "handle" I mean "in real
time", not "theoretica