On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:25 am, Neal Becker wrote:
> I can write a member
>
> F.__iadd__ (self, *args)
>
> and then call it with 2 args:
>
> f = F()
> f.__iadd__ (a, b)
>
> And then args is:
> (a, b)
If you find yourself explicitly calling dunder methods like __iadd__, that's
a sign you are tr
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> I can write a member
>
> F.__iadd__ (self, *args)
>
> and then call it with 2 args:
>
> f = F()
> f.__iadd__ (a, b)
>
> And then args is:
> (a, b)
>
> But it seems impossible to spell this as
>
> f += a, b
>
> That, instead, results in
>
> args
I can write a member
F.__iadd__ (self, *args)
and then call it with 2 args:
f = F()
f.__iadd__ (a, b)
And then args is:
(a, b)
But it seems impossible to spell this as
f += a, b
That, instead, results in
args = ((a, b),)
So should I just abandon the idea that += could be used this way?
