To be complete, the first code snippet, when modified as follows, works
fine in Python 2.4.2:
--- START ---
#!/usr/bin/env python
import copy
class Foo (object):
__slots__ = ('i', )
def __init__ (self):
self.i = 10
class Bar (Foo):
__slots__ = ('j', )
def __init__ (self):
supe
26 Dec 2005 20:33:35 -0800, fortepianissimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mystery solved - when there's only one slot I should've used __slots__
> = ('i', ). Duh!
>
> So in short, __slots__ and copy.copy() work fine in Python 2.4.2.
>
Hard works, but very useful :)
--
I like python!
My Blog: http://www.
Mystery solved - when there's only one slot I should've used __slots__
= ('i', ). Duh!
So in short, __slots__ and copy.copy() work fine in Python 2.4.2.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
More weird observations: the following code does not work until you
change the name of the member 'longer' to a one-char name, for example,
'j':
--- START ---
#!/usr/bin/env python
import copy
class Foo (object):
__slots__ = 'i'
class Bar (Foo):
__slots__ = 'longer'
#__slots__ = 'j'
I should've mentioned this was tested on Python 2.4.2.
fortepianissimo wrote:
> I remember from painful experience that copy.copy() won't really copy
> __slots__ members. But I have trouble explaning why the following code
> works:
>
> --- START---
> #!/usr/bin/env python
>
> import copy
>
>
> cl
I remember from painful experience that copy.copy() won't really copy
__slots__ members. But I have trouble explaning why the following code
works:
--- START---
#!/usr/bin/env python
import copy
class Foo (object):
__slots__ = 'i'
def __init__ (self):
self.i = 10
class Bar (Foo):
_
