Bengt Richter wrote:
> you can do what you like, pretty much. I.e.,
>
> cas = CAS()
> cas.a# like your plain a, where you said "that's it"
>
>
> cas.a, cas.b = cas.Expr(), cas.Expr()
> (cas.a + cas.b)/cas.c
>
> Etc.
Hmmm... feels like a good idea if extended to use propert
On 31 Mar 2005 14:48:00 -0800, "Kay Schluehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>From time to time I still use my old Mathematica system. The
>Mathematica language has some nice properties. The one I like best is
>the possibility to create symbols from nothing. Translated into the
>Python realm followin
>From time to time I still use my old Mathematica system. The
Mathematica language has some nice properties. The one I like best is
the possibility to create symbols from nothing. Translated into the
Python realm following creations are possible:
>>> a
a
That's it. Just make an 'a' as a pure symb
"Kay Schluehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> a = Symbol()
> >>> a
> a
Use
a = Symbol('a')
instead and it should solve most of the problems you mention. What's
supposed to happen anyway, in your proposal, after
a = Symbol()
b = a
print b
?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listi
>From time to time I still use my old Mathematica system. The
Mathematica language has some nice properties. The one I like best is
the possibility to create symbols from nothing. Translated into the
Python realm following creations are possible:
>>> a
a
That's it. Just make an 'a' as a pure symb
