On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> To be pedantic, it should be more like:
>
> return type(aiter).__dict__['__anext__']()
And of course, if you don't find it there then to be proper you also
have to walk the MRO and check all of those class dicts as well.
--
https://mail.pyt
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Steve D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:51 pm, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
>
>>> But I found it easy to write my own -
>>>
>>> async def anext(aiter):
>>>return await aiter.__anext__()
>>
>> Even simpler:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:51 pm, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
>> But I found it easy to write my own -
>>
>> async def anext(aiter):
>>return await aiter.__anext__()
>
> Even simpler:
>
> def anext(aiter):
> return aiter.__anext__()
With very
Ian Kelly :
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> Each "await" in a program is a (quasi-)blocking state. In each state,
>> the program needs to be ready to process different input events.
>
> Well, that's why you can have multiple different coroutines awaiting
> at any given
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> "Frank Millman" :
>
>> "Marko Rauhamaa" wrote in message news:87d1hd4d5k@elektro.pacujo.net...
>>> I don't think bulk iteration in asynchronous programming is ever that
>>> great of an idea. You want to be prepared for more than one
"Frank Millman" :
> "Marko Rauhamaa" wrote in message news:87d1hd4d5k@elektro.pacujo.net...
>> I don't think bulk iteration in asynchronous programming is ever that
>> great of an idea. You want to be prepared for more than one possible
>> stimulus in any given state. IOW, a state machi
Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:07 am, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>
>> Terry Reedy :
>>
>>> On 11/29/2016 9:25 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
>>>
Is there any technical reason for this, or is it just that no-one has
got around to writing an asynchronous version yet?
>>>
>>> Google'
"Ian Kelly" wrote in message
news:CALwzid=hrijtv4p1_6frkqub25-o1i8ouquxozd+aujgl7+...@mail.gmail.com...
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
>
> async def anext(aiter):
>return await aiter.__anext__()
Even simpler:
def anext(aiter):
return aiter.__anext__()
As a gen
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
> "Marko Rauhamaa" wrote in message news:87d1hd4d5k@elektro.pacujo.net...
>>
>>
>> One of the more useful ones might be:
>>
>> o = await anext(ait)
>>
>
> Definitely!
>
> But I found it easy to write my own -
>
> async def anext(aiter)
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Hmm. The thing is, comprehensions and generators are implemented with
> their own nested functions. So I would expect that their use of async
> is independent of the function they're in. But maybe we have a bug
> here?
>
async def spam(
"Marko Rauhamaa" wrote in message news:87d1hd4d5k@elektro.pacujo.net...
One of the more useful ones might be:
o = await anext(ait)
Definitely!
But I found it easy to write my own -
async def anext(aiter):
return await aiter.__anext__()
[...]
I don't think bulk iteration in
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> I have a couple of points to make with my question:
>
> * We are seeing the reduplication of a large subset of Python's
>facilities. I really wonder if the coroutine fad is worth the price.
I don't think there's any technical reason w
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Interestingly, I can't do that in a list comp:
>>
> [x async for x in aiterable]
>> File "", line 1
>> [x async for x in aiterable]
>>^
>> SyntaxError: invalid synta
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Interestingly, I can't do that in a list comp:
>
[x async for x in aiterable]
> File "", line 1
> [x async for x in aiterable]
>^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>
> Not sure why.
Because you tried to use an async compr
Chris Angelico :
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Any of these that depend on pumping the entire iterable can simply
> synchronify [1] the iterable:
One of the more useful ones might be:
o = await anext(ait)
> list(x async for x in aiterable)
>
> Interestingly, I
"Frank Millman" wrote in message news:o1k355$da5$1...@blaine.gmane.org...
Hi all
Python 3.6 has introduced Asynchronous Generators, which work very well.
[...]
However, it does not allow you to enumerate over the generator output -
[...]
Is there any technical reason for this, or is it
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Ok, so how about:
>
>aall(aiterable)
>aany(aiterable)
>class abytearray(aiterable[, encoding[, errors]])
>class adict(aiterable, **kwarg)
>class afilter(coro, aiterable)
>class afrozenset(aiterable)
>aiter(object[
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:07 am, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Terry Reedy :
>
>> On 11/29/2016 9:25 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any technical reason for this, or is it just that no-one has
>>> got around to writing an asynchronous version yet?
>>
>> Google's first hit for 'aenumerate' is
>>
Terry Reedy :
> On 11/29/2016 9:25 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
>
>> Is there any technical reason for this, or is it just that no-one has
>> got around to writing an asynchronous version yet?
>
> Google's first hit for 'aenumerate' is
> https://pythonwise.blogspot.com/2015/11/aenumerate-enumerate-for
On 11/29/2016 9:25 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
Is there any technical reason for this, or is it just that no-one has
got around to writing an asynchronous version yet?
Google's first hit for 'aenumerate' is
https://pythonwise.blogspot.com/2015/11/aenumerate-enumerate-for-async-for.html
Note that
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
> However, it does not allow you to enumerate over the generator output -
>
async def main():
>
> ... c = counter(5)
> ... async for j, k in enumerate(c):
> ... print(j, k)
> ... print('done')
> ...
loop.run_until_compl
Hi all
Python 3.6 has introduced Asynchronous Generators, which work very well.
Python 3.6.0b4 (default, Nov 22 2016, 05:30:12) [MSC v.1900 64 bit (AMD64)]
on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
import asyncio
loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
async def
22 matches
Mail list logo
