bambam a écrit :
Bruno Desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a side note, in Python, inheritance ...
... should usually not be used for typing.
:~(
I'm sorry, I don't even know what that means... The code I
have inherited from someone only a little
Thank you.
I'm glad to see that I don't need to choose between two
opposing viewpoints :~)
Steve.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Bruno Desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a side note, in Python, inheritance ...
... should usually not be used for typing.
:~(
I'm sorry, I don't even know what that means... The code I
have inherited from someone only a little more knowledgeable
than
On 2007-08-31, bambam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a side note, in Python, inheritance ... ... should usually
not be used for typing.
:~(
I'm sorry, I don't even know what that means... The code I have
inherited
bambam wrote:
[but he top-posted]
Dan Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 23, 10:21 pm, bambam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would someone like to suggest a replacement for this? This is a
function that returns different kinds of similar objects, depending
on
bambam a écrit :
OTSteve, could you please stop top-posting ?-) TIA /OT
Dan Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 23, 10:21 pm, bambam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would someone like to suggest a replacement for this? This is a
function that returns different
Thank you. I didn't reply earlier because I was trying to get my
head around what you wrote, which was strange and foreign
to me.
It seems to me that the dictionary object you suggested is a
direct replacement for the function code, only more efficient
because the case table is internalised with
bambam a écrit :
Would someone like to suggest a replacement for this? This is a
function that returns different kinds of similar objects, depending
on what is asked for. PSP and PWR are classes. I don't really
want to re-write the calling code very much: I'm just wondering
if the function
Bruno Desthuilliers a écrit :
(snip)
and ALL_LOWER
That's 'ALL_UPPER', of course :(
for symbolic (pseudo)
constants.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
trying to be idiomatic
...I hope that if a python programmer looks at my code it
won't be an excuse to discard it. Less of an issue with Python
than with C/C++, but since I'm just starting...
def device(DeviceType):
if DeviceType=='PSP':
return Psp()
elif DeviceType==Power
bambam a écrit :
trying to be idiomatic
...I hope that if a python programmer looks at my code it
won't be an excuse to discard it.
Hopefully not - and nothing forces you into adopting the common
convention !-) But it's a fact that Python relies heavily on naming
conventions, and that it
Would someone like to suggest a replacement for this? This is a
function that returns different kinds of similar objects, depending
on what is asked for. PSP and PWR are classes. I don't really
want to re-write the calling code very much: I'm just wondering
if the function can be replaced with
On Aug 23, 10:21 pm, bambam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would someone like to suggest a replacement for this? This is a
function that returns different kinds of similar objects, depending
on what is asked for. PSP and PWR are classes. I don't really
want to re-write the calling code very much:
13 matches
Mail list logo
