At Tuesday 31/10/2006 21:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
casevh> You must use "gmake". "make" fails during "make check"
Very weird:
piggy:% make -v
GNU Make 3.80
piggy:% gmake -v
GNU Make 3.80
Nevertheless, using "gmake" instead of "make" did indeed work. Thanks for
the hint
>> I just compiled GMP 4.2.1 on a P4 using
>>
>> $ CFLAGS="" CC=gcc ./configure
>> $ gmake; gmake check
>>
casevh> You must use "gmake". "make" fails during "make check"
Very weird:
piggy:% make -v
GNU Make 3.80
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation,
Oops, on the double-post.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > A guy at work asked for functionality commonly found with rational numbers,
> > so I said I'd find and install something. I figured gmpy would be suitable,
> > alas I'm having trouble successfully building the underlying GMP 4.2.1
> > library
> A guy at work asked for functionality commonly found with rational numbers,
> so I said I'd find and install something. I figured gmpy would be suitable,
> alas I'm having trouble successfully building the underlying GMP 4.2.1
> library on a PC running Solaris 10 (won't compile with the default
> A guy at work asked for functionality commonly found with rational numbers,
> so I said I'd find and install something. I figured gmpy would be suitable,
> alas I'm having trouble successfully building the underlying GMP 4.2.1
> library on a PC running Solaris 10 (won't compile with the default
Gabriel> Try clnum included in:
Gabriel> http://sourceforge.net/projects/calcrpnpy
I tried that as well before trying GMP. It (the base clnum library)
complained about the absence of GMP during configure and failed to compile.
Skip
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
At Tuesday 31/10/2006 14:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A guy at work asked for functionality commonly found with rational numbers,
so I said I'd find and install something. I figured gmpy would be suitable,
alas I'm having trouble successfully building the underlying GMP 4.2.1
library on a PC ru
Paul> There are certainly some of those around, but I'm surprised
Paul> there's a problem with GMP and Solaris.
That was my thought as well.
Skip
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Performance is, for now, certainly not an issue. Even a pure Python
> rational number class would probably suffice.
There are certainly some of those around, but I'm surprised there's a
problem with GMP and Solaris.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-li
A guy at work asked for functionality commonly found with rational numbers,
so I said I'd find and install something. I figured gmpy would be suitable,
alas I'm having trouble successfully building the underlying GMP 4.2.1
library on a PC running Solaris 10 (won't compile with the default --host,
10 matches
Mail list logo
