Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
If you can, I'd suggest posting a bug report on SF against 2.4 to see
whether you can encourage the installer builder to upgrade BSD DB -
though do be certain to check what's in 2.4.1c1 first.
It's 4.2.52, and I don't think I'm going to use anything else for 2.4.1.
In
It doesn't seem like the python 2.4(and the recent 2.4.1) support
berkeley db 4.3. (4.3 fixes some deadlock bugs I occasionally encounter
using 4.2.)
bsddb3(at pybsddb.sf.net) already supports 4.3 since last December(but
doesn't explicitly support win32 -- see the assert statement in
setup.py). I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't seem like the python 2.4(and the recent 2.4.1) support
berkeley db 4.3.
What makes you say that? It builds fine for me.
bsddb3(at pybsddb.sf.net) already supports 4.3 since last December(but
doesn't explicitly support win32 -- see the assert statement in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't seem like the python 2.4(and the recent 2.4.1) support
berkeley db 4.3. (4.3 fixes some deadlock bugs I occasionally encounter
using 4.2.)
bsddb3(at pybsddb.sf.net) already supports 4.3 since last December(but
doesn't explicitly support win32 -- see the assert
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't seem like the python 2.4(and the recent 2.4.1) support
berkeley db 4.3.
What makes you say that? It builds fine for me.
Oh, it doesn't work with 2.4(I tried this one) but with 2.4.1
seemingly.
In the setup.py from 2.4 there is a