Okay, thats what I was looking for, thanks.
In my case, I'll just implement the (needed) reflected operators in my
class.
Chris
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Daniel Urban wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 01:51, Chris Kaynor
> wrote:
> > I am implemented a custom set-like type which inter
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 01:51, Chris Kaynor wrote:
> I am implemented a custom set-like type which interacts with some
> third-party software when retrieving and mutating the set, and have derived
> my custom type off of collections.MutableSet, however I have noticed that
> some of the magic metho
I am implemented a custom set-like type which interacts with some
third-party software when retrieving and mutating the set, and have derived
my custom type off of collections.MutableSet, however I have noticed that
some of the magic methods supported by the built-in set do not fully
function with