On 16 Mar 2005 06:37:45 -0500, Carl Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have a virtually completed port of CMUCL to Win32. And, if I was
not busy organizing a Lisp conference, it would be publicly available
by now.
If it's the conference I think, then the deadline for papers was about
a week
Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Last I looked, 2 years ago?, there were no compiled, open source lisps that
ran on Windows. Has this changed?
I have a virtually completed port of CMUCL to Win32. And, if I was
not busy organizing a Lisp conference, it would be publicly
James Graves wrote:
If you want to do application development, Common Lisp is where it's
at, no doubt about it. There are more and better libraries for CL
these days, and they are easier to install and manage with tools like
ASDF. Multiple open-source implementations, covering the most
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:25:02 -0800, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
Last I looked, 2 years ago?, there were no compiled, open source lisps that
ran on Windows. Has this changed?
I don't think so. I recently (about 2 months ago) started to want to learn
Lisp (didn't go far for now) and wanted to
Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Graves wrote:
If you want to do application development, Common Lisp is where it's
at, no doubt about it. There are more and better libraries for CL
these days, and they are easier to install and manage with tools like
ASDF. Multiple
Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Last I looked, 2 years ago?, there were no compiled, open source
lisps that ran on Windows. Has this changed?
GCL (formerly known as KCL and ACL) has been around since 1984,
and has been available on Windows since 2000.
ECL (another KCL
James Graves wrote:
But coverage in this area (compiled CL) is a bit thin, I'll admit.
But who really cares? After all, there are the mature commercial
proprietary lisp compilers for those people who insist on using
closedware OSes, and they've already proven they're willing to use
