Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info added the comment:
All is duplicate on already posted patches . It is not work to review limited
functionality posted here.
--
nosy: +rpetrov
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
A quick search gives me:
- #1006238
- #1597850
- #3754
- #5404
- #3871
Are they the same patches from Buildroot?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
New submission from STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com:
Buildroot: Making Embedded Linux easy has patches for Python 2.7 to simplify
the cross-compilation of Python:
http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/tree/package/python
The maintainer, Thomas Petazzoni, told me that the 12 first
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +eric.araujo, tarek
stage: - needs patch
type: - feature request
versions: -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11365
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
buildroot-python-patches.tar.gz: today checkout of the git repository
(package/python).
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20965/buildroot-python-patches.tar.gz
___
Python tracker
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
buildboot.patch: the 12 patches combined into a single patch for Python 2.7.
Note: python-2.7-001-support-for-build.patch doesn't apply cleanly on
release27-maint.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file:
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Well, the patches should be first ported to 3.3 (and need checking that they
don't break anything: test suite, etc.). Then, if you want them to be examined
separately, it might be better to create a separate issue for each.
--
nosy:
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
I uploaded the patch to Rietveld for a review:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4253047
Well, the patches should be first ported to 3.3
Ok, I will ask the author if he can do this job. I uploaded the patches for
Python 2.7 for a
Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info added the comment:
fixed patch failure on Parser/pgen.stamp
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20534/python-2.7-20110126-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20536/python-py3k-20110126-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19586/python-2.7-20101112-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19588/python-py3k-20101112-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info added the comment:
It seems to me I forgot to upload version after updates in Lib/sysconfig.py
from issue 7880.
I could not understand what Florent Xicluna (flox). I could not reproduce it.
To me update abspath - realpath is bogus and with reverted
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Arfrever
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Could someone with knowledge of the Python build systems please comment on
this, thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk:
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
___
} library;
- ignore friendly search library paths : this is useless in case of
cross-compilation . Also it is reported that those paths are not so friendly
even in native builds. Note that with friendly search library paths python
library search based on file suffix will find libraries system
of
setup.py and Makefile.pre.in (moved from issue 3871) :
- build modules with system python (from 3871).
- configure ctypes with same arguments as top configure (new)
--
title: minimal cross-compilation support for configure - cross-compilation
support for python build
Added file: http
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14539/python-trunk-20090722-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15260/python-trunk-20091104-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15415/python-trunk-20091129-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15464/python-trunk-20091206-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15724/python-trunk-20100103-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15987/python-trunk-20100124-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info added the comment:
system python has to be at least revision 77704 (trunk)
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15987/python-trunk-20100124-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org:
--
keywords: +needs review
priority: - normal
stage: - patch review
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
--
versions: +Python 2.7
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15724/python-trunk-20100103-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15464/python-trunk-20091206-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15415/python-trunk-20091129-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15260/python-trunk-20091104-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file12677/python-trunk.patch-CROSS-20090110
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14277/python-trunk-20090612-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
--
components: +Build
type: - feature request
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14277/python-trunk-20090612-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Victor Godoy Poluceno victorpoluc...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +victorpoluceno
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13692/python-trunk-20090415-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11664/python-trunk-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file12268/python-trunk-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12677/python-trunk.patch-CROSS-20090110
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Roumen Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The support for *-*mingw* host is enhanced to native msys environment.
This include check for device file /dev/ptmx. The MSYS report that file
exist. As the check is skipped on mingw* host os now cugwin environment
can be used too.
Also check
Changes by Roumen Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11664/python-trunk-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
Changes by Roumen Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11337/python-trunk-CROSS.patch
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
New submission from Roumen Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is minimal patch that add basic cross-compilation possibilities for
python build (configure script).
The patch add macro AC_CANONICAL_HOST.
This macro require files config.guess, config.sub. The patch don't
include them. You may obtain
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
What about to start to resolve issues step by step ?
The first step surely should be to get the autoconf issue resolved.
I don't think distutils cross-compilation is going to work, instead,
people wishing to cross-compile should edit Modules/Setup.
Regards,
Martin
What about to start to resolve issues step by step ?
The first step surely should be to get the autoconf issue resolved.
I don't think distutils cross-compilation is going to work, instead,
people wishing to cross-compile should edit Modules/Setup.
Regards,
Martin
--
http://mail.python.org
Hi list members,
It seems to me that this is discussed many times in the past but without
progress. As I understand in general there is no objections and
preferred cross-compilation has to be based on distutils (scons was
rejected).
So I would like to cross-compile from linux(build system
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Martin - my patch creates a new executable in Lib\distutils\command, and
IMO it should be included in binary builds for all windows platforms.
Is there something I should change in the MSI process?
Yes, I fixed that in r62255: it now
Mark Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Checked in r62197, including the patch from Thomas. Note I expanded the
patch to the distutils doc (noting you need to build Python itself for
the target platform before it works) and added a short entry to Misc/NEWS
--
resolution: -
Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Could somebody with a 64bit CPU please extend the PCbuild/README.txt? I
don't have the means to test 64bit builds or cross compilation of a
32bit build on a 64bit system. I only have 32bit CPUs at home.
+1 for nmake if you can get it to work
Trent Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Christian, regarding shipping x64 .lib files as well as 32-bit ones --
sensible idea, but where would we place the x64 version libs? In Python
[xx]\libs\amd64? (This would mirror the approach used with PCbuild and
PCbuild\amd64 -- although
Trent Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Updated PCbuild/readme.txt in r62105 and r62106 for trunk and py3k
respectively.
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2513
__
Mark Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I'd like to keep this issue specifically about cross-compilation in the
current tree, and while some of the other ideas may have merit, let's
not bog this issue down with them unless they directly impact the patch.
Does anyone have any comments
Marc-Andre Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Hi Mark,
I hope this patch makes it into 2.6.
One thing I'm curious about is the version of Visual Studio 2008 that
is needed to support this kind cross-compilation and which version will
be or is used to build the Python versions on 64
Marc-Andre Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Nevermind, diving deep into the MSDN, I found the answer:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hs24szh9.aspx
So for cross-compilation, the Visual Studio 2008 Standard Edition is
sufficient.
Is the Professional Edition used
Mark Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Hi Marc-Andre,
The PCBuild/README.txt file has some info about compatibility with VS
versions (but probably needs to say more about x64 builds). There is
also talk about releasing Profile Guided Optimization built binaries,
which does require
new build system I checked
in a few weeks ago.
As it currently stands, the Professional version of Visual Studio 2008
is required for a complete x64 build, however, this is because a cross-
compilation 'vsvars32.bat'-type file needs to be called in order to do
command line (i.e. nmake) x64
Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Mark, I think you mixed me up with Christian Heimes, so I'm removing
myself here (at least for now).
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2513
__
Trent Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Humm, just saw the MSDN page Marc-Andre referred to, which indeed seems
to indicate the Express edition doesn't support x64 cross-compilation
*at all*. AFAICT the latest Platform SDK (6.1) ships with an x64 cross
compilation environment
Changes by Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
nosy: +tiran
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2513
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
nosy: +theller
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2513
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I had to make additional changes to PCBuild\pcbuild.sln to create a
64-bit wininst-9.0-amd64.exe (but I was not able to try out if it works
or not).
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9914/pcbuild.diff
__
components: Distutils
files: windows-cross-compile.patch
keywords: 64bit, patch
messages: 64743
nosy: Trent.Nelson, ctheune, loewis, mhammond
severity: normal
status: open
title: 64bit cross compilation on windows
type: feature request
versions: Python 2.6
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9900/windows
301 - 362 of 362 matches
Mail list logo
