ocsch...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't port the entire app to be a stored database procedure.
Perhaps I underestimate what you mean by this, but you may want to look
at pyTables (http://www.pytables.org/moin/HowToUse).
ctypes, maybe. I just find it odd that there's no quick answer on the
fastest
On Jan 29, 12:23 am, ocsch...@gmail.com wrote:
> I just find it odd that there's no quick answer on the
> fastest way in Python to implement a mapping in this context.
A Python dict is as fast as you can get. If that is not enough, your
only choice is to try something at the C level, which may gi
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:20:41 -0800, ocschwar wrote:
> On Jan 28, 4:50 pm, Aaron Brady wrote:
>> On Jan 28, 2:38 pm, ocsch...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Hello, quoting myself from another thread today:
>>
>> There is the 'shelve' module. You could create a shelf that tells you
>> the filename of the
ocsch...@gmail.com schrieb:
On Jan 28, 4:50 pm, Aaron Brady wrote:
On Jan 28, 2:38 pm, ocsch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, quoting myself from another thread today:
There is the 'shelve' module. You could create a shelf that tells you
the filename of the 5 other ones. A million keys should be
On Jan 28, 5:21 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> ocsch...@gmail.com schrieb:
>
>
>
> > Hi, all.
>
> > I have an application that that creates, manipulates, and finally
> > archives on disk 10^6 instances of an object that in CS/DB terms is
> > best described as a relation.
>
> > It has 8 members, a
On Jan 28, 4:50 pm, Aaron Brady wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2:38 pm, ocsch...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hello, quoting myself from another thread today:
>
> There is the 'shelve' module. You could create a shelf that tells you
> the filename of the 5 other ones. A million keys should be no
> problem, I guess
ocsch...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi, all.
I have an application that that creates, manipulates, and finally
archives on disk 10^6 instances of an object that in CS/DB terms is
best described as a relation.
It has 8 members, all of them common Python datatypes. 6 of these are
set once and then not mo
On Jan 28, 2:38 pm, ocsch...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I have an application that that creates, manipulates, and finally
> archives on disk 10^6 instances of an object that in CS/DB terms is
> best described as a relation.
>
> It has 8 members, all of them common Python datatypes. 6 of these
Hi, all.
I have an application that that creates, manipulates, and finally
archives on disk 10^6 instances of an object that in CS/DB terms is
best described as a relation.
It has 8 members, all of them common Python datatypes. 6 of these are
set once and then not modified. 2 are modified around
