Fwd: gmpy moving to code.google.com

2007-03-01 Thread Daniel Nogradi
> > Could you please tell me, on that 64-bit build, what happens with: > > > >>> importgmpy, sys, operator > > >>> sys.maxint > > ??? > > >>>gmpy.mpz(sys.maxint) > > ??? > > >>> operator.index(gmpy.mpz(sys.maxint)) > > ??? > > >>> sys.maxint+1 > > ??? > > >>>gmpy.mpz(sys.maxint+1) > > ??? > > >>> o

Re: gmpy moving to code.google.com

2007-02-28 Thread Daniel Nogradi
> Could you please tell me, on that 64-bit build, what happens with: > > >>> import gmpy, sys, operator > >>> sys.maxint > ??? > >>> gmpy.mpz(sys.maxint) > ??? > >>> operator.index(gmpy.mpz(sys.maxint)) > ??? > >>> sys.maxint+1 > ??? > >>> gmpy.mpz(sys.maxint+1) > ??? > >>> operator.index(gmpy.mpz(

Re: gmpy moving to code.google.com

2007-02-28 Thread aleaxit
On Feb 27, 1:38 pm, "Ziga Seilnacht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex Martelli wrote: > > On Feb 27, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Daniel Nogradi wrote: > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > I did another test, this time with python 2.4 on suse and things are > > > worse than in the previous case (which was python 2.5 on

Re: gmpy moving to code.google.com

2007-02-28 Thread aleaxit
On Feb 27, 9:10 am, "Daniel Nogradi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Alex, > > > > I did another test, this time with python 2.4 on suse and things are > > > worse than in the previous case (which was python 2.5 on fedora 3), > > > ouput of 'python gmp_test.py' follows: > > > Interesting! gmpy

Re: gmpy moving to code.google.com

2007-02-27 Thread Ziga Seilnacht
Alex Martelli wrote: > On Feb 27, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Daniel Nogradi wrote: > > > Hi Alex, > > > I did another test, this time with python 2.4 on suse and things are > > worse than in the previous case (which was python 2.5 on fedora 3), > > ouput of 'python gmp_test.py' follows: > > Interesting! gm

Re: gmpy moving to code.google.com

2007-02-27 Thread Daniel Nogradi
> > Hi Alex, > > > > I did another test, this time with python 2.4 on suse and things are > > worse than in the previous case (which was python 2.5 on fedora 3), > > ouput of 'python gmp_test.py' follows: > > Interesting! gmpy interacts with decimal.Decimal by "monkey- > patching" that class on th

Re: gmpy moving to code.google.com

2007-02-27 Thread Alex Martelli
On Feb 27, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Daniel Nogradi wrote: > Hi Alex, > > I did another test, this time with python 2.4 on suse and things are > worse than in the previous case (which was python 2.5 on fedora 3), > ouput of 'python gmp_test.py' follows: Interesting! gmpy interacts with decimal.Decimal

Re: gmpy moving to code.google.com

2007-02-27 Thread Daniel Nogradi
Hi Alex, I did another test, this time with python 2.4 on suse and things are worse than in the previous case (which was python 2.5 on fedora 3), ouput of 'python gmp_test.py' follows: Unit tests for gmpy 1.02 release candidate on Python 2.4 (#1, Mar 22 2005, 21:42:42) [GCC 3.3.5 20050117 (p

Re: gmpy moving to code.google.com

2007-02-26 Thread Alex Martelli
On 2/26/07, Daniel Nogradi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > Svn checkout, compilation and installation went okay but some tests > failed, this is the output of 'python test_gmpy.py': Thanks for the report! That test is trying to check that a previously existing memory leak went away, and unfor

Re: gmpy moving to code.google.com

2007-02-26 Thread Daniel Nogradi
> If you're interested in gmpy (the Python wrapper of GMP, for > unlimited-precision arithmetic, rationals, random number generation, > number-theoretical functions, etc), please DO check out > http://code.google.com/p/gmpy/ -- gmpy 1.02 is there (as far as I can > tell) in a workable state. Sourc

gmpy moving to code.google.com

2007-02-26 Thread Alex Martelli
If you're interested in gmpy (the Python wrapper of GMP, for unlimited-precision arithmetic, rationals, random number generation, number-theoretical functions, etc), please DO check out http://code.google.com/p/gmpy/ -- gmpy 1.02 is there (as far as I can tell) in a workable state. Source on Subve