Paul Boddie schrieb:
>> It seems that everybody is proposing libraries that use in-memory
>> representations. There is a standard xml package for Python, it's
>> called "xml" (and comes with the standard library). It contains a
>> SAX interface, xml.sax, which can parse files incrementally.
>
> Wh
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> Is there a standard xml package for Python? Preferably high-level, fast
>> and that can parse in-file, not in-memory since I have to deal with
>> potentially MBs of data.
>
> It seems that everybody is proposing libraries that use in-memory
> representations. There is
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>
> It seems that everybody is proposing libraries that use in-memory
> representations. There is a standard xml package for Python, it's
> called "xml" (and comes with the standard library). It contains a
> SAX interface, xml.sax, which can parse files incrementally.
What a
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Gleb Rybkin schrieb:
>> I searched online, but couldn't really find a standard package for
>> working with Python and XML -- everybody seems to suggest different
>> ones.
>>
>> Is there a standard xml package for Python? Preferably high-level, fast
>> and that can parse in-
Gleb Rybkin schrieb:
> I searched online, but couldn't really find a standard package for
> working with Python and XML -- everybody seems to suggest different
> ones.
>
> Is there a standard xml package for Python? Preferably high-level, fast
> and that can parse in-file, not in-memory since I h
Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> In Python 2.5, cElementTree and ElementTree will be available in the
> standard library as xml.etree.cElementTree and
> xml.etree.ElementTree. So learning them now is a great idea.
Only some of the original ElementTree software is going into 2.5,
Tim N. van der Leeuw wrote:
> Another option is Amara; also quite high-level and also allows for
> incremental parsing. I would say Amara is somewhat higher level than
> ElementTree since it allows you to access your XML nodes as Python
> objects (with some extra attributes and some minor warts), a
Hi Gleb,
Gleb Rybkin wrote:
> I searched online, but couldn't really find a standard package for
> working with Python and XML -- everybody seems to suggest different
> ones.
>
> Is there a standard xml package for Python? Preferably high-level, fast
> and that can parse in-file, not in-memory sin
Okay, thanks!
Steven Bethard wrote:
> Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> > Gleb Rybkin wrote:
> >
> >> I searched online, but couldn't really find a standard package for
> >> working with Python and XML -- everybody seems to suggest different
> >> ones.
> >>
> >> Is there a standard xml package for Python?
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> Gleb Rybkin wrote:
>
>> I searched online, but couldn't really find a standard package for
>> working with Python and XML -- everybody seems to suggest different
>> ones.
>>
>> Is there a standard xml package for Python? Preferably high-level, fast
>> and that can parse i
Gleb Rybkin wrote:
> I searched online, but couldn't really find a standard package for
> working with Python and XML -- everybody seems to suggest different
> ones.
>
> Is there a standard xml package for Python? Preferably high-level, fast
> and that can parse in-file, not in-memory since I ha
I searched online, but couldn't really find a standard package for
working with Python and XML -- everybody seems to suggest different
ones.
Is there a standard xml package for Python? Preferably high-level, fast
and that can parse in-file, not in-memory since I have to deal with
potentially MBs
12 matches
Mail list logo
