This is almost the same code as Greg's with the only difference being that
test for configuration having been done. But the test is unnecessary. I
don't see how setConfig could be invoked in the super of the base class (A),
so such a test would be relevant only in subclasses, if they DO invoke
Dan Perl wrote:
Here is a problem I am having trouble with and I hope someone in this group
will suggest a solution. First, some code that works. 3 classes that are
derived from each other (A->B->C), each one implementing only 2 methods,
__init__ and setConfig.
Thank you very much, Greg, that does the job! Somehow I couldn't see it and
I needed someone to point out to me.
Dan
"Greg Ewing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dan Perl wrote:
>> So far, so good! But let's assume that I want to change the __init__
>> methods s
Dan Perl wrote:
So far, so good! But let's assume that I want to change the __init__
methods so that they take a configuration as an argument so the objects are
created and configured in one step, like this:
alpha = A(config)
One way would be to make the setConfig call only
in the root class, an
Here is a problem I am having trouble with and I hope someone in this group
will suggest a solution. First, some code that works. 3 classes that are
derived from each other (A->B->C), each one implementing only 2 methods,
__init__ and setConfig.
