On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:23:56PM -0800, Martin Lopez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Martin Lopez. I just downloaded Python 3.9.1 (64 bit) Setup.
>
> After I install the program then try to run it, with no success.
>
> I've uninstalled all previous versions and reinstalled them, but it does
> n
On 2/9/21 4:23 PM, Martin Lopez wrote:
Hello,
My name is Martin Lopez. I just downloaded Python 3.9.1 (64 bit) Setup.
After I install the program then try to run it, with no success.
I've uninstalled all previous versions and reinstalled them, but it does
not seem to help.
Can you please assi
On 10/02/2021 12.23, Martin Lopez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Martin Lopez. I just downloaded Python 3.9.1 (64 bit) Setup.
>
> After I install the program then try to run it, with no success.
>
> I've uninstalled all previous versions and reinstalled them, but it does
> not seem to help.
>
>
Hello,
My name is Martin Lopez. I just downloaded Python 3.9.1 (64 bit) Setup.
After I install the program then try to run it, with no success.
I've uninstalled all previous versions and reinstalled them, but it does
not seem to help.
Can you please assist?
Thank you,
--
https://mail.python.o
Okay, I've figured it out. It's easy (but stupid)... right click the
extension installer program, and choose Run as Administrator.
Just posting this so the next Google search for an answer might actually
find one.
--
Mattia Gentilini wrote:
will ha scritto:
Vista is a 64 bit OS and there is no port of pywin32 for either Vista
or 64-bit XP
Vista exists in BOTH 32 bit and 64 bit versions.
Indeed, and this is running on a Core 2 Duo laptop, a 32 bit platform.
The problem is obvious (or seems to be
will ha scritto:
> Vista is a 64 bit OS and there is no port of pywin32 for either Vista
> or 64-bit XP
Vista exists in BOTH 32 bit and 64 bit versions.
--
|\/|55: Mattia Gentilini e 55 curve di seguito con gli sci
|/_| ETICS project at CNAF, INFN, Bologna, Italy
|\/| www.getfirefox.com www.gett
Vista is a 64 bit OS and there is no port of pywin32 for either Vista
or 64-bit XP
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I'm having errors installing Python extensions on Vista. I'm running
Python 2.5, and every extension install produces "cannot create"
errors. For instance, win32all 210 says:
Could Not Create: pywin32-py2.5
Could Not Set Key Value: Python 2.5 pywin32-210
Could Not Set Key Value: (followed by t
On 11/30/05, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul McNett wrote:
> > Robert Kern wrote:
> >
> >>Although Ubuntu is a Debian derivative, it does have different packages.
> >>At the moment, Debian's default Python is 2.3 although one can also
> >>install Python 2.4, and most Python packages i
Paul McNett wrote:
> Robert Kern wrote:
>
>>Although Ubuntu is a Debian derivative, it does have different packages.
>>At the moment, Debian's default Python is 2.3 although one can also
>>install Python 2.4, and most Python packages in Debian have been built
>>for both (that's why I erroneously r
Robert Kern wrote:
> Although Ubuntu is a Debian derivative, it does have different packages.
> At the moment, Debian's default Python is 2.3 although one can also
> install Python 2.4, and most Python packages in Debian have been built
> for both (that's why I erroneously recommended installing th
Paul McNett wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>Thanks a lot for the clarification. I don't have a compelling reason
>>not to use 2.3 other than having to install the modules I've already
>>set up for 2.4. Not really a big deal. Looks like I'll be switching to
>>2.3.
>
> Umm, for what it's wort
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the clarification. I don't have a compelling reason
> not to use 2.3 other than having to install the modules I've already
> set up for 2.4. Not really a big deal. Looks like I'll be switching to
> 2.3.
Umm, for what it's worth: I'm on Ubuntu (a Debian d
Hi Ken,
Thanks a lot for the clarification. I don't have a compelling reason
not to use 2.3 other than having to install the modules I've already
set up for 2.4. Not really a big deal. Looks like I'll be switching to
2.3.
Thanks again,
Aaron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
> Thanks for the suggestion, but an apt-cache search python2.4-wxgtk2.4
> returns no results for a package with that name.
As you observed, the Debian wxPython packages currently only support one
version of Python at a time. That decision ripples down and ends up
affecting a number of other thin
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the suggestion, but an apt-cache search python2.4-wxgtk2.4
returns no results for a package with that name.
Aaron
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to install wxPython on Debian using 'apt-get install
> python-wxgtk2.4.' I've got both Python 2.3 and 2.4 installed with 2.4
> set as my default. For whatever reason, wxPython always installs under
> /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages.
>
> Does anyo
Hi all,
I'm trying to install wxPython on Debian using 'apt-get install
python-wxgtk2.4.' I've got both Python 2.3 and 2.4 installed with 2.4
set as my default. For whatever reason, wxPython always installs under
/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages.
Does anyone know how I can force it to install in
19 matches
Mail list logo
