Re: jython's future (was: Python development time is faster.)

2006-11-13 Thread Carsten Haese
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 18:34 +0100, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Honestly, how many important Python modules do still run on 2.2? InformixDB still compiles on 2.2 except when I accidentally temporarily break backwards compatibility. Of course it's a matter of opinion whether it qualifies as an important

jython's future (was: Python development time is faster.)

2006-11-13 Thread Stefan Behnel
Diez B. Roggisch wrote > I wouldn't consider jython abandonware. It is under active development, and > I'm using a 2.2 alpha successful for quite a while now - which usually > serves my needs. > > The problem is/was that new-style classes were a major hurdle to take, and > this now seems to be con