> On 1 Apr 2024, at 18:14, Left Right via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> It sounds weird that symbols from Limited API are _missing_ (I'd
> expect them to be there no matter what library version you link with).
You have to specify the version of the limited API that you want to use.
Each release ad
have a package per version of Python. Maintenance-wise it's going to
be a lot easier.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:13 AM Barry via Python-list
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 28 Mar 2024, at 16:13, Olivier B. via Python-list
> > wrote:
> >
> > But on Linux, it seems th
without the -lpython and it should
just work.
Barry
>
> Le ven. 29 mars 2024 à 10:10, Barry a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 28 Mar 2024, at 16:13, Olivier B. via Python-list
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> But on Linux, it seems that linking to
libpython.so, which could be pointing to any
version. I'll try that next
Le ven. 29 mars 2024 à 10:10, Barry a écrit :
>
>
>
> > On 28 Mar 2024, at 16:13, Olivier B. via Python-list
> > wrote:
> >
> > But on Linux, it seems that linking to libpython3.so instead of
> On 28 Mar 2024, at 16:13, Olivier B. via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> But on Linux, it seems that linking to libpython3.so instead of
> libpython3.11.so.1.0 does not have the same effect, and results in
> many unresolved python symbols at link time
>
> Is this functio
Linux, it seems that linking to libpython3.so instead of
libpython3.11.so.1.0 does not have the same effect, and results in
many unresolved python symbols at link time
Is this functionality only available on Windows?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I have a north viriginia ec2 linux instance and a windows machine at my home,
how do I connec tthem?
import paramiko
import time
def run_scripts():
# Set your local machine's SSH details
local_machine_ip = ' '
username = 'justk'
private_key_path = &#x
On 24/05/2023 6:00 pm, Mike Dewhirst wrote:
On 23/05/2023 7:16 pm, Chris Green wrote:
Mike Dewhirst wrote:
[-- multipart/mixed, encoding 7bit, 22 lines --]
[-- text/plain, encoding base64, charset: UTF-8, 16 lines --]
On 21/05/2023 5:53 am, Chris Green wrote:
I'm converting a bash scri
On 23/05/2023 7:16 pm, Chris Green wrote:
Mike Dewhirst wrote:
[-- multipart/mixed, encoding 7bit, 22 lines --]
[-- text/plain, encoding base64, charset: UTF-8, 16 lines --]
On 21/05/2023 5:53 am, Chris Green wrote:
I'm converting a bash script to python as it has become rather clumsy
i
On Tue, 23 May 2023, 17:25 Chris Green, wrote:
> Mike Dewhirst wrote:
> > [-- multipart/mixed, encoding 7bit, 22 lines --]
> >
> > [-- text/plain, encoding base64, charset: UTF-8, 16 lines --]
> >
> > On 21/05/2023 5:53 am, Chris Green wrote:
> > > I'm converting a bash script to python as i
Mike Dewhirst wrote:
> [-- multipart/mixed, encoding 7bit, 22 lines --]
>
> [-- text/plain, encoding base64, charset: UTF-8, 16 lines --]
>
> On 21/05/2023 5:53 am, Chris Green wrote:
> > I'm converting a bash script to python as it has become rather clumsy
> > in bash.
>
> What is the use
On 21/05/2023 5:53 am, Chris Green wrote:
I'm converting a bash script to python as it has become rather clumsy
in bash.
What is the use case?
However I have hit a problem with converting dates, the bash script
has:-
dat=$(date --date "$1" +"%Y/%m/%d")
and this will accept almost anyth
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:41 PM Mats Wichmann wrote:
> On 5/20/23 13:53, Chris Green wrote:
> > I'm converting a bash script to python as it has become rather clumsy
> > in bash.
> >
> > However I have hit a problem with converting dates, the bash script
> > has:-
> >
> > dat=$(date --date
On 5/20/23 13:53, Chris Green wrote:
I'm converting a bash script to python as it has become rather clumsy
in bash.
However I have hit a problem with converting dates, the bash script
has:-
dat=$(date --date "$1" +"%Y/%m/%d")
and this will accept almost anything reasonably sensible that c
I'm converting a bash script to python as it has become rather clumsy
in bash.
However I have hit a problem with converting dates, the bash script
has:-
dat=$(date --date "$1" +"%Y/%m/%d")
and this will accept almost anything reasonably sensible that can be
interpreted as a date, in particul
Hello, i'm working with an employer that is looking to hire a Linux
platform engineer for their office in India and Singapore that has
experience in automation and management of platform configuration from
both an onprem and cloud perspective. Consequently, I had hoped that
some members may
Anssi Saari writes:
> "Loris Bennett" writes:
>
>> I am aware that an individual user could use (mini)conda to install a
>> more recent version of Python in his/her home directory, but I am
>> interested in how root would install such a program.
>
> Root would install the script and required Pyt
versions to do the right thing.
Cheers,
Loris
> From: Python-list
> on behalf of Loris Bennett
> Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 12:27 PM
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Distributing program for Linux
> *** Attention: This is an external email. Use caution responding,
"Loris Bennett" writes:
> I am aware that an individual user could use (mini)conda to install a
> more recent version of Python in his/her home directory, but I am
> interested in how root would install such a program.
Root would install the script and required Python version somewhere
depending
, (e.g.
python3.10).
A typical shebang line would be:
#!/usr/bin/env python3.10
From: Python-list on
behalf of Loris Bennett
Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 12:27 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Distributing program for Linux
*** Attention: This is an external email. Use caution
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 04:43:14PM +0100, Loris Bennett wrote:
If I write a system program which has Python >= 3.y as a dependency,
what are the options for someone whose Linux distribution provides
Python 3.x, where x < y?
The docs suggest creating your own package or building and inst
Hi,
If I write a system program which has Python >= 3.y as a dependency,
what are the options for someone whose Linux distribution provides
Python 3.x, where x < y?
I am aware that an individual user could use (mini)conda to install a
more recent version of Python in his/her home director
There's a link at the bottom of each message to the list info pager. Follow
the directions on that page to unsubscribe.
Skip
On Wed, Mar 8, 2023, 5:38 PM Thomas Gregg wrote:
> Is there any way to be removed from this list?
> Thank you, Tom
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 3:51 PM Skip Montanaro
> w
Is there any way to be removed from this list?
Thank you, Tom
On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 3:51 PM Skip Montanaro
wrote:
> > Hello, I'm working with an employer that is looking to hire someone in
> > (Edinburgh or London) that can administer on-prem and vmware
> > platforms.
> >
>
> James,
>
> If you
> Hello, I'm working with an employer that is looking to hire someone in
> (Edinburgh or London) that can administer on-prem and vmware
> platforms.
>
James,
If you haven't already, please post to the Phone Jobs Board:
https://www.python.org/jobs/
Skip
>
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/lis
Hello, I'm working with an employer that is looking to hire someone in
(Edinburgh or London) that can administer on-prem and vmware
platforms. Consequently, I had hoped that some members of this group
may like to discuss further. I can be reached using "JamesBTobin (at)
Gmail (dot) Com". Kind re
The Unix convention is 0 means everything went well, and non-zero means
something else happened. Here’s a contrived example of a bash wrapper around
GNU tar. By contrived I mean it works but I would not use it in practice … I’d
just use tar directly or use the Python tarfile module if I wanted f
LINUX, Windows and so
on. I have half a dozen varieties on my machine from various
modes/distributions.
As some have pointed out, any RECENT version of python (presumably the 3
version unless your goal is to teach the older version) should be fine for
teaching but obviously all kinds of tools can help
On 2022-08-04, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Fedora is an excellent choice for Python users. Fedora 36 already comes
> with Python 3.11.0b5 in its main repository. In fact you have Python
> 2.7, 3.5-3.11, PyPy 2.7, PyPy 3.7-3.9, and MicroPython at your fingertips.
Except that real programmers use
On 04/08/2022 20.12, Barry wrote:
Noted with thanks Kushal. Since I can download FREE copies of RHEL
9.0, I will use it then.
I consider rhel 9 is an old os. I would suggest using fedora over rhel.
Fedora 36 has python 3.10 and the when fedora 37 is released it will have
python 3.11.
And fedor
> On 4 Aug 2022, at 09:48, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 13:02, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 04 2022 at 10:22:41 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
>>> wrote:
>>> Subject: Which linux dis
On 8/3/22 19:01, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
Subject: Which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
programming language?
You might try Pythontu.
Not really. Get the distro that looks appealing to you.
One won't be better than the other with regard to lea
On 2022-08-04, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> Subject: Which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
> programming language?
You can learn Python on any Linux distribution.
First answer this question:
* Whom are you going to ask for help when you run into
eatures in RHEL9.
As another post says, Fedora is closer to the bleeding-edge of Linux
development.
RHEL 9.0 is also quite close to the bleeding edge of Linux
development. It has Linux kernel version 5.14.0.
Be aware that there are many methods of adding Python. For example, if
your training is ba
tter. Is RHEL 9.0 the best out of 7.x,
> > 8.x and 9.x?
>
> RedHat is a stable OpSys. Accordingly, it doesn't much matter which
> version. The general assumption is that the more recent distribution has
> more advanced facilities, eg improved security features in RHEL9.
>
stable OpSys. Accordingly, it doesn't much matter which
version. The general assumption is that the more recent distribution has
more advanced facilities, eg improved security features in RHEL9.
As another post says, Fedora is closer to the bleeding-edge of Linux
development.
Be aware tha
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 13:02, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 04 2022 at 10:22:41 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> wrote:
> > Subject: Which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
> > programming language?
> >
> > Good day from Singapor
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 11:05, dn wrote:
>
> On 04/08/2022 14.31, Paul Bryan wrote:
> > I wouldn't say any particular Linux distribution is appreciably better
> > for Python development than another. I would suggest using a version of
> > a Linux distribution that sup
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 10:47, orzodk wrote:
>
> Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming writes:
>
> > noted with thanks. I have been using Linux for more than 10 years already
>
> Ah, if you're familiar with Redhat (RPM) based distributions, consider
> Fedora as you will
On Thu, Aug 04 2022 at 10:22:41 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> Subject: Which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
> programming language?
>
> Good day from Singapore,
>
> May I know which linux distro is more conducive for learning the
&g
On 04/08/2022 14.31, Paul Bryan wrote:
> I wouldn't say any particular Linux distribution is appreciably better
> for Python development than another. I would suggest using a version of
> a Linux distribution that supports a recent Python release (e.g. 3.9 or
> 3.10).
+1
As
Subject: Which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
programming language?
Good day from Singapore,
May I know which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
programming language?
Since I have absolutely and totally FREE RHEL developer subscription (I
don&#
I actually did a Google search for "which linux distro is best for python".
Link:
https://www.google.com/search?q=which+linux+distro+is+best+for+python&rlz=1C1GCEA_enSG1005SG1005&sxsrf=ALiCzsYaL58MJsevR2Uc0nnWtmc7kWFbIg%3A1659580387580&ei=4y_rY
I wouldn't say any particular Linux distribution is appreciably better
for Python development than another. I would suggest using a version of
a Linux distribution that supports a recent Python release (e.g. 3.9 or
3.10).
On Thu, 2022-08-04 at 10:22 +0800, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Subject: Which linux distro is more conducive for learning the Python
programming language?
Good day from Singapore,
May I know which linux distro is more conducive for learning the
Python programming language?
Since I have absolutely and totally FREE RHEL developer subscription
(I don't
On Sat, 21 May 2022 at 11:22, Michael Torrie wrote:
> And of course the answer given by the grandparent is that Dan should use
> a normal linux shebang line in his scripts and on Windows the py
> launcher will read that shebang and guestimate the proper python
> interpreter to use and
On 5/12/22 11:59, De ongekruisigde wrote:
> On 2022-05-12, Mats Wichmann wrote:
>> On 5/12/22 10:25, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>>> Hi folks.
>>>
>>> I heard there's a Windows-like "py" command for Linux (and Mac?).
>>>
>>> I'm
On 2022-05-12, Mats Wichmann wrote:
> On 5/12/22 10:25, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>> Hi folks.
>>
>> I heard there's a Windows-like "py" command for Linux (and Mac?).
>>
>> I'm finally getting to porting a particular project's Python 2.7 c
On 5/12/22 10:25, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I heard there's a Windows-like "py" command for Linux (and Mac?).
>
> I'm finally getting to porting a particular project's Python 2.7 code to
> 3.x, and one of the first steps will probably be cha
On 2022-05-12 17:25, Dan Stromberg wrote:
Hi folks.
I heard there's a Windows-like "py" command for Linux (and Mac?).
I'm finally getting to porting a particular project's Python 2.7 code to
3.x, and one of the first steps will probably be changing a lot of "py
Hi folks.
I heard there's a Windows-like "py" command for Linux (and Mac?).
I'm finally getting to porting a particular project's Python 2.7 code to
3.x, and one of the first steps will probably be changing a lot of "python2
script.py" to use #!/usr/bin/env
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 at 17:14, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>
> On 2022-04-16 16:49:17 +0200, Marco Sulla wrote:
> > Furthermore, you didn't answer my simple question: why does the
> > security update package contain metadata about Debian patches, if the
> > Ubuntu security team did not benefit from Debi
On 2022-04-16 16:49:17 +0200, Marco Sulla wrote:
> Furthermore, you didn't answer my simple question: why does the
> security update package contain metadata about Debian patches, if the
> Ubuntu security team did not benefit from Debian security patches but
> only from internal work?
It DOES NOT
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 at 10:15, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> It doesn't (or at least you can't conclude that from the evidence you
> posted).
>
> There is a subdirectory called "debian" in the build directory of every
> .deb package. This is true on Debian, Ubuntu and every other
> distribution which us
On 2022-04-14 19:31:58 +0200, Marco Sulla wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 at 20:05, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> >
> > On 2022-04-12 21:03:00 +0200, Marco Sulla wrote:
> > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 00:10, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > > > They are are about a year apart, so they will usually contain
> > > >
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 at 20:05, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>
> On 2022-04-12 21:03:00 +0200, Marco Sulla wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 00:10, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > > They are are about a year apart, so they will usually contain different
> > > versions of most packages right from the start. So
On 2022-04-12 21:03:00 +0200, Marco Sulla wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 00:10, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > They are are about a year apart, so they will usually contain different
> > versions of most packages right from the start. So the Ubuntu and Debian
> > security teams probably can't benefit
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 00:10, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> They are are about a year apart, so they will usually contain different
> versions of most packages right from the start. So the Ubuntu and Debian
> security teams probably can't benefit much from each other.
Well, this is what my updater on
;t disagree. But I suppose the
people that use the unstable version of some Linux distro are useful
for testing and reporting bugs, also security one. So they contribute
to the stable versions, and I think we have to be grateful to these
"pioneers".
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2022-03-31 09:46:14 +0200, Cecil Westerhof via Python-list wrote:
> "Peter J. Holzer" writes:
> > Standard policy (there are exceptions) on most distros is to stay with
> > the same version of any package for the entire lifetime. So for example,
> > Ubuntu 20.04 was released with Apache 2.4.41
"Peter J. Holzer" writes:
> On 2022-03-30 08:48:36 +0200, Marco Sulla wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 00:10, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>> > They are are about a year apart, so they will usually contain different
>> > versions of most packages right from the start. So the Ubuntu and Debian
>> > sec
"Peter J. Holzer" writes:
> On 2022-03-28 15:35:07 +0200, Cecil Westerhof via Python-list wrote:
>> "Loris Bennett" writes:
>> > Ubuntu is presumably relying on the Debian security team as well as
>> > other volunteers and at least one company, namely Canonical.
>>
>> Nope. One important reason
On 2022-03-30 08:48:36 +0200, Marco Sulla wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 00:10, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > They are are about a year apart, so they will usually contain different
> > versions of most packages right from the start. So the Ubuntu and Debian
> > security teams probably can't benefit
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 00:10, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> They are are about a year apart, so they will usually contain different
> versions of most packages right from the start. So the Ubuntu and Debian
> security teams probably can't benefit much from each other.
Are you sure? Since LTS of Debian
On 2022-03-28 15:35:07 +0200, Cecil Westerhof via Python-list wrote:
> "Loris Bennett" writes:
> > Ubuntu is presumably relying on the Debian security team as well as
> > other volunteers and at least one company, namely Canonical.
>
> Nope. One important reason that I really hate that people use
"Loris Bennett" writes:
> Marco Sulla writes:
>
>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 19:10, Michael Torrie wrote:
>>> Both Debian stable and Ubuntu LTS state they have a five year support
>>> life cycle.
>>
>> Yes, but it seems that official security support in Debian ends after
>> three years:
>>
>> "Deb
Am 19.03.22 um 01:08 schrieb Ankit Agarwal:
This is a very specific question. I am trying to figure out whether or not
I can use pre-built python libraries and headers on Windows in a MinGW
build on Linux.
With the mingw cross-compiler on Linux that should be possible, however
I guess it
On 3/18/22, Ankit Agarwal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a very specific question. I am trying to figure out whether or not
> I can use pre-built python libraries and headers on Windows in a MinGW
> build on Linux. Essentially I have some python and C++ code which interface
> via cy
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 8:03 PM Ankit Agarwal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a very specific question. I am trying to figure out whether or not
> I can use pre-built python libraries and headers on Windows in a MinGW
> build on Linux. Essentially I have some python and C++ code which
Hi,
This is a very specific question. I am trying to figure out whether or not
I can use pre-built python libraries and headers on Windows in a MinGW
build on Linux. Essentially I have some python and C++ code which interface
via cython and pybind. I want to build a self contained C++ binary for
Dear Loris,
"Loris Bennett" writes:
> (...thanks...)
> The sysadmins I know who are interested in long-term stability and
> avoiding unnecessary OS updates use Debian rather than Ubuntu,
+1; Reasonable!
Sincerely, Linux fan Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//
--
http
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 18:33, Loris Bennett wrote:
> I am not sure how different the two situations are. Ubuntu is
> presumably relying on the Debian security team as well as other
> volunteers and at least one company, namely Canonical.
So do you think that Canonical contributes to the LTS secu
Marco Sulla writes:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 19:10, Michael Torrie wrote:
>> Both Debian stable and Ubuntu LTS state they have a five year support
>> life cycle.
>
> Yes, but it seems that official security support in Debian ends after
> three years:
>
> "Debian LTS is not handled by the Debian
Cousin Stanley wrote:
>> apt-cache search lxqt | grep ^lxqt
Chris Angelico wrote:
> Much faster:
>
> apt-cache pkgnames lxqt
>
> apt-cache search will look for "lxqt" in descriptions too,
> hence the need to filter those out
>
> apt-cache pkgnames is used by tab completion)
>
Thanks
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 19:10, Michael Torrie wrote:
> Both Debian stable and Ubuntu LTS state they have a five year support
> life cycle.
Yes, but it seems that official security support in Debian ends after
three years:
"Debian LTS is not handled by the Debian security team, but by a
separate g
On 3/11/22 11:03, Marco Sulla wrote:
> Anyway I think I'll not install Debian, because it's LTS releases are
> not long enough for me. I don't know if there's a distro based on
> Debian that has a long LTS support, Ubuntu apart.
Both Debian stable and Ubuntu LTS state they have a five year support
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 06:38, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> That's an attribute of your desktop environment, not the Linux distribution.
>
> EG: I'm using Debian with Cinnamon, which does support ctrl-alt-t.
Never used Cinnamon. It comes from Mint, right?
> Some folks say t
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 19:57, Roel Schroeven wrote:
>
> Op 11/03/2022 om 3:50 schreef Chris Angelico:
> > On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 09:51, Cousin Stanley
> > wrote:
> > > The following will display a list of lxqt packages
> > > that are in the repository and available to install
> > >
> >
Op 11/03/2022 om 3:50 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 09:51, Cousin Stanley wrote:
> The following will display a list of lxqt packages
> that are in the repository and available to install
>
> apt-cache search lxqt | grep ^lxqt
>
Much faster:
apt-cache pkgnames lxqt
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 16:39, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Some folks say the desktop environment matters more than the distribution,
> when choosing what OS to install.
Matters more to the choice? Impossible to say.
Matters more to the UI? Without a doubt.
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/
the shortcut ctrl+alt+t to open a terminal
> that Ubuntu has. I'm quite sure it's simple to add, but I'm starting
> to be old and lazy...
>
That's an attribute of your desktop environment, not the Linux distribution.
EG: I'm using Debian with Cinnamon, which does sup
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 09:51, Cousin Stanley wrote:
>
> Marco Sulla wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Maybe Debian itself?
> >
> > I tried Debian on a VM, but I found it too much basical. A little
> > example: it does not have the shortcut ctrl+alt+t to open a terminal
> > that Ubuntu has. I'm quite sure it's si
Marco Sulla wrote:
>>
>> Maybe Debian itself?
>
> I tried Debian on a VM, but I found it too much basical. A little
> example: it does not have the shortcut ctrl+alt+t to open a terminal
> that Ubuntu has. I'm quite sure it's simple to add, but I'm starting
> to be old and lazy...
>
I use the
On 3/10/22 12:42, Marco Sulla wrote:
> PS: Is it just my impression or is there a plebiscite for Debian?
A vote? No I don't think so. Not sure what you mean. The reason we're
all suggesting Debian is because you specifically said you want a LTS
Debian-like distro. Can't get any more Debian-like
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 14:13, Jack Dangler wrote:
> or why not get a cloud desktop running whatever distro you want and you
> don't have to do anything
Three reasons: privacy, speed, price. Not in this order.
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 15:20, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Very easy. I use Debian with Xfc
On 3/10/22 06:03, Marco Sulla wrote:
> I tried Debian on a VM, but I found it too much basical. A little
> example: it does not have the shortcut ctrl+alt+t to open a terminal
> that Ubuntu has. I'm quite sure it's simple to add, but I'm starting
> to be old and lazy...
Debian has the same desktop
Marco Sulla writes:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 04:50, Michael Torrie wrote:
>>
>> On 3/9/22 13:05, Marco Sulla wrote:
>> > So my laziness pays. I use only LTS distros, and I update only when
>> > there are security updates.
>> > PS: any suggestions for a new LTS distro? My Lubuntu is reaching its
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 00:05, Marco Sulla wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 04:50, Michael Torrie wrote:
> >
> > On 3/9/22 13:05, Marco Sulla wrote:
> > > So my laziness pays. I use only LTS distros, and I update only when
> > > there are security updates.
> > > PS: any suggestions for a new LTS
On 3/10/22 08:03, Marco Sulla wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 04:50, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 3/9/22 13:05, Marco Sulla wrote:
So my laziness pays. I use only LTS distros, and I update only when
there are security updates.
PS: any suggestions for a new LTS distro? My Lubuntu is reaching its
en
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 04:50, Michael Torrie wrote:
>
> On 3/9/22 13:05, Marco Sulla wrote:
> > So my laziness pays. I use only LTS distros, and I update only when
> > there are security updates.
> > PS: any suggestions for a new LTS distro? My Lubuntu is reaching its
> > end-of-life. I prefer lig
On 3/9/22 13:05, Marco Sulla wrote:
> So my laziness pays. I use only LTS distros, and I update only when
> there are security updates.
> PS: any suggestions for a new LTS distro? My Lubuntu is reaching its
> end-of-life. I prefer lightweight debian-like distros.
Maybe Debian itself?
--
https://
ca.com/information-technology/2022/03/linux-has-been-bitten-by-its-most-high-severity-vulnerability-in-years/
>
> --
> ~Ethan~
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/03/linux-has-been-bitten-by-its-most-high-severity-vulnerability-in-years/
--
~Ethan~
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Às 23:55 de 13/10/21, Michael Torrie escreveu:
> On 10/13/21 12:09 PM, Paulo da Silva wrote:
>> spyder and eric are both python editors/debuggers! Why are they related
>> with web browsers?!
>
> Good point. I was going off of the chromium bug report. My bad. I
> mistook Spyder for Selenium, which
Às 16:16 de 14/10/21, Mats Wichmann escreveu:
> On 10/13/21 16:55, Michael Torrie wrote:
>> On 10/13/21 12:09 PM, Paulo da Silva wrote:
>>> spyder and eric are both python editors/debuggers! Why are they related
>>> with web browsers?!
>>
>> Good point. I was going off of the chromium bug report. M
On 10/13/21 16:55, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 10/13/21 12:09 PM, Paulo da Silva wrote:
spyder and eric are both python editors/debuggers! Why are they related
with web browsers?!
Good point. I was going off of the chromium bug report. My bad. I
mistook Spyder for Selenium, which is a web scrapi
On 10/13/21 12:09 PM, Paulo da Silva wrote:
> spyder and eric are both python editors/debuggers! Why are they related
> with web browsers?!
Good point. I was going off of the chromium bug report. My bad. I
mistook Spyder for Selenium, which is a web scraping scripting engine
that does use a real
On 2021-10-13 19:09:43 +0100, Paulo da Silva wrote:
> Às 02:08 de 12/10/21, Michael Torrie escreveu:
> > On 10/8/21 4:32 PM, Paulo da Silva wrote:
> >> Às 22:56 de 08/10/21, Paulo da Silva escreveu:
> >>> I need to debug a python3 script under root. I tried spyder but it does
> >>> not work.
> >>>
Às 02:08 de 12/10/21, Michael Torrie escreveu:
> On 10/8/21 4:32 PM, Paulo da Silva wrote:
>> Às 22:56 de 08/10/21, Paulo da Silva escreveu:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I need to debug a python3 script under root. I tried spyder but it does
>>> not work.
>>>
>>> Running as root without --no-sandbox is not supp
Às 22:54 de 11/10/21, Chris Angelico escreveu:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 8:52 AM Paulo da Silva
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I need to debug a python3 script under root. I tried spyder but it does
>> not work.
>>
>> Running as root without --no-sandbox is not supported. See
>> https://crbug.com/638180
1 - 100 of 3173 matches
Mail list logo
