On Jul 14, 11:16 pm, Larry Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vinay,
Thanks for your detailed explanation, but IMHO your suggested solution is
almost
the opposite (right idea wrong direction) of what I'm looking for.
Hypothetical
setup:
application1 - SocketHandlerloggingturned on
Vinay Sajip wrote:
On Jul 14, 11:16 pm, Larry Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vinay,
Thanks for your detailed explanation, but IMHO your suggested solution is almost
the opposite (right idea wrong direction) of what I'm looking for. Hypothetical
setup:
application1 -
Larry Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can multiple applications send SocketHandler logging records to the
same socket server on the same port simultaneously?
Of course they can. Server can accept requests from many clients.
You have used `SocketServer.ThreadingTCPServer`. That server for
Rob Wolfe wrote:
Larry Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can multiple applications send SocketHandler logging records to the
same socket server on the same port simultaneously?
Of course they can. Server can accept requests from many clients.
You have used `SocketServer.ThreadingTCPServer`.
On Jul 13, 9:25 pm, Larry Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every time I look at theloggingmodule (up until now) I've given up and
continue to use my home-grown logger that I've been using for years. I'm not
giving up this time ;-)
I find that I REALLY need to be able to monitor LOTS of
Vinay Sajip wrote:
On Jul 13, 9:25 pm, Larry Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every time I look at theloggingmodule (up until now) I've given up and
continue to use my home-grown logger that I've been using for years. I'm not
giving up this time ;-)
I find that I REALLY need to be able to
Every time I look at the logging module (up until now) I've given up and
continue to use my home-grown logger that I've been using for years. I'm not
giving up this time ;-)
I find that I REALLY need to be able to monitor LOTS of running
programs/processes and thought it would be nice to
