Re: mmap as a sequence behavior

2006-06-29 Thread Lawrence Oluyede
Lawrence Oluyede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What am I missing from the C API? Found. I edit abstract.c placing some printf here and there and discovered PyObject_GetItem is always called and in turn it call PySequence_GetItem so is there my index is translated. -- Lawrence - http://www.oluyed

Re: mmap as a sequence behavior

2006-06-29 Thread Lawrence Oluyede
Scott David Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is sequence behavior. The convention of -1 for last, -2 for > second-to-last, ... is done before it gets to your C code. I suspect > if you don't define a __len__ method, you'd suppress this. I defined a __len__ method but I get the index "

Re: mmap as a sequence behavior

2006-06-28 Thread Scott David Daniels
Lawrence Oluyede wrote: > While wrapping mmap indexing/sequence emulation I noticed something > "strange". What's got my attention was the fact that passing -1 from > Python does not trigger the exception but is changed to the last > positive and valid index > I expect this raise IndexEr

mmap as a sequence behavior

2006-06-28 Thread Lawrence Oluyede
While wrapping mmap indexing/sequence emulation I noticed something "strange". The source code of this oddity is: static PyObject * mmap_item(mmap_object *self, Py_ssize_t i) { CHECK_VALID(NULL); if (i < 0 || (size_t)i >= self->size) { PyErr_SetString(PyExc_IndexError, "mmap index