Re: mod_pylite?

2009-01-02 Thread excord80
project called ``mod_perlite``. It     sounds like it will be very handy. Anyone working on a     ``mod_pylite``?  Has it been done before, maybe under a different     name? It's kind of hard to tell.  There's very little description of how mod_perlite would be different than

Re: mod_pylite?

2009-01-02 Thread Fuzzyman
On Jan 2, 2:49 pm, excord80 excor...@gmail.com wrote: [snip...] It sounds interesting, however, after reading a bit about it, I see that a large part of wsgi is providing a nice interface between web server and webapp. I don't think I need any such interface, or at least, a replacement for

mod_pylite?

2009-01-01 Thread excord80
Just read this interesting post by chromatic on what features Perl 5 needs right now http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2008/12/five-features-perl-5-needs-now.html and he mentions a neat-looking project called ``mod_perlite``. It sounds like it will be very handy. Anyone working on a ``mod_pylite

Re: mod_pylite?

2009-01-01 Thread skip
http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2008/12/five-features-perl-5-needs-now.html and he mentions a neat-looking project called ``mod_perlite``. It sounds like it will be very handy. Anyone working on a ``mod_pylite``? Has it been done before, maybe under a different name? It's

Re: mod_pylite?

2009-01-01 Thread excord80
On Jan 1, 9:12 pm, s...@pobox.com wrote:     http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2008/12/five-features-perl-5-needs-now.html     and he mentions a neat-looking project called ``mod_perlite``. It     sounds like it will be very handy. Anyone working on a     ``mod_pylite``?  Has it been done

Re: mod_pylite?

2009-01-01 Thread Graham Dumpleton
. Anyone working on a     ``mod_pylite``?  Has it been done before, maybe under a different     name? It's kind of hard to tell.  There's very little description of how mod_perlite would be different than mod_perl other than it would be more lightweight, presumably as mod_php somehow