Re: most complete xml package for Python?

2007-03-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 15, 5:45 pm, "Paul Boddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can't remember exactly how I solved this within anXML/XSLT-heavy > Java-based framework, I just put a single space between: and then it kept the XML container-style as opposed to single-tag. -- http://mail.python.org/mailma

Re: most complete xml package for Python?

2007-03-15 Thread Paul Boddie
Diez B. Roggisch wrote: > metaperl schrieb: > > > > Well, I'm not a troll. And I am now even less impressed with > > ElementTree. It does not preserve the document but reforms it in > > certain cases. > > > > > > > > gets rewritten as > > > > > > > > which leads to problems when embedding Dojo Ri

Re: most complete xml package for Python?

2007-03-15 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
metaperl schrieb: > On Mar 14, 5:34 pm, "John Machin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Given keywords like "Amara" and "Elementtree" and past history, it >> looked to me like a troll of one kind trying to incite a troll of >> another kind to pop out from under the bridge and chew on his >> ankle

Re: most complete xml package for Python?

2007-03-15 Thread Paul Boddie
On 14 Mar, 17:45, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Although the phrase "without even checking them all out" hardly lends > credence to the OP's assertion of Amara's superiority, and does tend to > support a hypothesis involving some ulterior motive (or would if less > ingenuously done).

Re: most complete xml package for Python?

2007-03-15 Thread John Machin
On Mar 15, 9:04 am, "metaperl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 14, 5:34 pm, "John Machin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Given keywords like "Amara" and "Elementtree" and past history, it > > looked to me like a troll of one kind trying to incite a troll of > > another kind to pop out from un

Re: most complete xml package for Python?

2007-03-14 Thread Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, metaperl wrote: > Well, I'm not a troll. And I am now even less impressed with > ElementTree. It does not preserve the document but reforms it in > certain cases. > > > > gets rewritten as > > > > which leads to problems when embedding Dojo Rich Text Editors. So thos

Re: most complete xml package for Python?

2007-03-14 Thread metaperl
On Mar 14, 5:34 pm, "John Machin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Given keywords like "Amara" and "Elementtree" and past history, it > looked to me like a troll of one kind trying to incite a troll of > another kind to pop out from under the bridge and chew on his > ankle :-) Well, I'm not a trol

Re: most complete xml package for Python?

2007-03-14 Thread John Machin
On Mar 15, 3:45 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Boddie wrote: > > On 14 Mar, 16:15, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> metaperl wrote: > >>> Without even checking them all out, I'm thinking the Amara XML Toolkit > >>> must be the most feature-packed. > >> Please check

Re: most complete xml package for Python?

2007-03-14 Thread Steve Holden
Paul Boddie wrote: > On 14 Mar, 16:15, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> metaperl wrote: >>> Without even checking them all out, I'm thinking the Amara XML Toolkit >>> must be the most feature-packed. >> Please check out lxml before you post FUD like this. >> >> http://codespeak.net/lxml/

Re: most complete xml package for Python?

2007-03-14 Thread Paul Boddie
On 14 Mar, 16:15, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > metaperl wrote: > > Without even checking them all out, I'm thinking the Amara XML Toolkit > > must be the most feature-packed. > > Please check out lxml before you post FUD like this. > > http://codespeak.net/lxml/ Calm down, Stefan! Th

Re: most complete xml package for Python?

2007-03-14 Thread Stefan Behnel
metaperl wrote: > Without even checking them all out, I'm thinking the Amara XML Toolkit > must be the most feature-packed. Please check out lxml before you post FUD like this. http://codespeak.net/lxml/ Regards, Stefan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: most complete xml package for Python?

2007-03-13 Thread Gerard Flanagan
On Mar 13, 1:43 pm, "metaperl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Without even checking them all out, I'm thinking the Amara XML Toolkit > must be the most feature-packed. The developers are readily available > on IRC for support and they seem to make regular releases. > > As a meld3 user, I have been us

most complete xml package for Python?

2007-03-13 Thread metaperl
Without even checking them all out, I'm thinking the Amara XML Toolkit must be the most feature-packed. The developers are readily available on IRC for support and they seem to make regular releases. As a meld3 user, I have been using ElementTree under the hood, but was dismayed to find out that y