name capitalization of built-in types, True, and False

I see that naming conventions are such that classes usually get named CamelCase. So why are the built-in types named all lowercase (like list, dict, set, bool, etc.)? And names for instances of classes are usually written in lowercase, like foo in ``foo = CamelCase()``. So why are True and False (

Re: name capitalization of built-in types, True, and False

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I see that naming conventions are such that classes usually get named > CamelCase. So why are the built-in types named all lowercase (like > list, dict, set, bool, etc.)? > > And names for instances of classes are usually written in lowercase, > like foo in ``foo = Camel

Re: name capitalization of built-in types, True, and False

En Fri, 11 May 2007 17:37:48 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > I see that naming conventions are such that classes usually get named > CamelCase. So why are the built-in types named all lowercase (like > list, dict, set, bool, etc.)? Because most of them originally were types and factory fun