On 11/29/2012 10:39 AM, Nobody wrote:
Every time I see your posts "Shanghai Noodle Factory" sticks in my head
as my daily hummer. :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:09:44 +0100, Thomas Rachel wrote:
> The variant with shell=True is more os.popen()-like, but has security
> flaws (e.g., what happens if there are spaces or, even worse, ";"s in the
> command string?
I think that you're conflating the shell= option with whether the command
Am 27.11.2012 19:00 schrieb Andrew:
I'm looking into os.popen and the subprocess module, implementing
os.popen is easy but i hear it is depreciating however I'm finding the
implemantation of subprocess daunting can anyone help
This is only the first impression.
subprocess is
Andrew wrote:
>
>I'm working on a script that will run an executable obtaine the output
> from the executable
>and do some analysis on the output. Essentially the script runs the
>executable analyses
>the data.
>I'm looking into os.popen and the subprocess modu
On 27/11/2012 18:00, Andrew wrote:
Hello world,
I'm working on a script that will run an executable obtaine the output
from the executable
and do some analysis on the output. Essentially the script runs the
executable analyses
the data.
I'm looking into os.popen and the subproc
Andrew wrote:
>
> Hello world,
>
> I'm working on a script that will run an executable obtaine the output
> from the executable
> and do some analysis on the output. Essentially the script runs the
> executable analyses
> the data.
> I'm looking in
Hello world,
I'm working on a script that will run an executable obtaine the output
from the executable
and do some analysis on the output. Essentially the script runs the
executable analyses
the data.
I'm looking into os.popen and the subprocess module, implementing os.popen
i
