Re: parametized unittest

2014-01-12 Thread CraftyTech
On Saturday, January 11, 2014 11:34:30 PM UTC-5, Roy Smith wrote: > In article , > > "W. Trevor King" wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 08:00:05PM -0800, CraftyTech wrote: > > > > I'm finding it hard to use unittest in a for loop. Perhaps something > > > like: > > > > > > > > for

Re: parametized unittest

2014-01-11 Thread Roy Smith
In article , "W. Trevor King" wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 08:00:05PM -0800, CraftyTech wrote: > > I'm finding it hard to use unittest in a for loop. Perhaps something like: > > > > for val in range(25): > > self.assertEqual(val,5,"not equal) > > > > The loop will break after the first

Re: parametized unittest

2014-01-11 Thread W. Trevor King
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 08:00:05PM -0800, CraftyTech wrote: > I'm finding it hard to use unittest in a for loop. Perhaps something like: > > for val in range(25): > self.assertEqual(val,5,"not equal) > > The loop will break after the first failure. Anyone have a good > approach for this? ple

Re: parametized unittest

2014-01-11 Thread Ben Finney
CraftyTech writes: > I'm trying parametize my unittest so that I can re-use over and over, > perhaps in a for loop. The ‘testscenarios’ https://pypi.python.org/pypi/testscenarios> library allows you to define a set of data scenarios on your FooBarTestCase and have all the test case functions in

parametized unittest

2014-01-11 Thread CraftyTech
hello all, I'm trying parametize my unittest so that I can re-use over and over, perhaps in a for loop. Consider the following: ''' import unittest class TestCalc(unittest.TestCase): def testAdd(self): self.assertEqual(7, 7, "Didn't add up") if __name__=="__ma